(O-22) Intracavernosal botulinum toxin for erectile dysfunction: preliminary results from a double-blind, randomized controlled trial

Abstract Introduction/Objective Erectile dysfunction (ED) affects quality of life and has limited response to conventional treatments in ~30% of patients. Botulinum toxin (BT), a neuromodulator with smooth muscle relaxation effects, has shown potential in early studies. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of intracavernosal BT for ED in patients unresponsive to standard therapy. Materials and Methods This is a prospective, double-blind, randomized study comparing BT (100 U) vs. placebo (saline) injected into the penile shaft. Male participants aged ≥18 with IIEF-5 ≤ 21 and using standard ED treatments were eligible. Exclusion criteria included genitourinary neoplasms, radical prostatectomy, hypogonadism (testosterone <350 ng/dL), anatomical abnormalities, and low sexual activity. Outcomes were assessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-injection using IIEF-5 scores. Four patients were lost to follow-up (16%), resulting in 21 evaluable cases (BT: n = 11; placebo: n = 10). After 6 months, blinding was lifted and crossover was allowed. Results Baseline IIEF-5 scores were comparable between groups (Placebo: 10.5; BT: 10.4; p = 0.859; Mann–Whitney U test). At 3 months, both groups improved (Placebo: 13.8; BT: 14.6; p = 0.878), with no significant difference between them. However, intra-group analysis using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed a significant increase in IIEF-5 scores in the BT group (p = 0.028), while the placebo group showed only a trend (p = 0.091). At 6 months, scores remained elevated (Placebo: 12.6; BT: 13.3; p = 0.806). Conclusions Intracavernosal BT appears safe and well tolerated, with promising clinical improvement in patients with ED refractory to conventional therapy. While intergroup comparisons showed no statistical difference, intra-group analysis suggests sustained benefit with BT. Larger trials are needed to confirm these findings. Financing No conflict.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdag002.022
Primary Topic
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

(O-22) Intracavernosal botulinum toxin for erectile dysfunction: preliminary results from a double-blind, randomized controlled trial

CVdO Vasconcelos, F B Carrerette, R G Viterbo, H R J Júnior et al.
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
article

(O-22) Intracavernosal botulinum toxin for erectile dysfunction: preliminary results from a double-blind, randomized controlled trial

CVdO Vasconcelos, F B Carrerette, R G Viterbo, H R J Júnior, R Damião, J L Schiavini, RdTeF Filho, G M Crelier, C M C Lara
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction/Objective Erectile dysfunction (ED) affects quality of life and has limited response to conventional treatments in ~30% of patients. Botulinum toxin (BT), a neuromodulator with smooth muscle relaxation effects, has shown potential in early studies. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of intracavernosal BT for ED in patients unresponsive to standard therapy. Materials and Methods This is a prospective, double-blind, randomized study comparing BT (100 U) vs. placebo (saline) injected into the penile shaft. Male participants aged ≥18 with IIEF-5 ≤ 21 and using standard ED treatments were eligible. Exclusion criteria included genitourinary neoplasms, radical prostatectomy, hypogonadism (testosterone <350 ng/dL), anatomical abnormalities, and low sexual activity. Outcomes were assessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-injection using IIEF-5 scores. Four patients were lost to follow-up (16%), resulting in 21 evaluable cases (BT: n = 11; placebo: n = 10). After 6 months, blinding was lifted and crossover was allowed. Results Baseline IIEF-5 scores were comparable between groups (Placebo: 10.5; BT: 10.4; p = 0.859; Mann–Whitney U test). At 3 months, both groups improved (Placebo: 13.8; BT: 14.6; p = 0.878), with no significant difference between them. However, intra-group analysis using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed a significant increase in IIEF-5 scores in the BT group (p = 0.028), while the placebo group showed only a trend (p = 0.091). At 6 months, scores remained elevated (Placebo: 12.6; BT: 13.3; p = 0.806). Conclusions Intracavernosal BT appears safe and well tolerated, with promising clinical improvement in patients with ED refractory to conventional therapy. While intergroup comparisons showed no statistical difference, intra-group analysis suggests sustained benefit with BT. Larger trials are needed to confirm these findings. Financing No conflict.

The Journal of Sexual MedicineVol. 23(Supplement_1)
Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto (BR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.