Sexual Offences:R v Gray (Stuart Allen)

This case engages two interrelated doctrinal and procedural concerns central to the adjudication of sexual offences: (i) the evidential threshold for placing lack of consent before a jury, and (ii) the clarity and adequacy of judicial directions on both lack of consent and belief in consent.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bristol Research (University of Bristol)
Published
2025-12-31
Primary Topic
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sexual Offences:R v Gray (Stuart Allen)

Jennifer Collins
Bristol Research (University of Bristol)
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
article

Sexual Offences:R v Gray (Stuart Allen)

Jennifer Collins
article en

Abstract

This case engages two interrelated doctrinal and procedural concerns central to the adjudication of sexual offences: (i) the evidential threshold for placing lack of consent before a jury, and (ii) the clarity and adequacy of judicial directions on both lack of consent and belief in consent.

Bristol Research (University of Bristol)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
OpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sexual Offences:R v Gray (Stuart Allen) — Jennifer Collins · Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS