Towards system-aware governance of marine carbon dioxide removal: a review of interdependent challenges

Marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) is increasingly discussed as a potential climate response, yet its governance remains underdeveloped. This study conducts a structured literature review, following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses framework, to identify and analyse governance challenges associated with mCDR within the broader context of multilateral ocean governance. Using the socio–ecological–technological systems (SETSs) framework, challenges were systematically coded to capture interdependencies across social, ecological, and technological (S/E/T) domains. The analysis of 35 peer-reviewed publications identified 100 distinct governance challenges, revealing that most cannot be categorised within single-system domains. Instead, challenges frequently span intersections between S/E/T systems, highlighting issues such as fragmented governance structures, ecological risks from technological interventions, and legitimacy concerns linked to deployment. These findings underscore the systemic nature of mCDR governance challenges and the limitations of siloed governance approaches. The study demonstrates that applying a SETS perspective enables the identification of cross-domain trade-offs, synergies, and coordination gaps, supporting the development of system-aware governance frameworks for mCDR.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Publication Database IASS (Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS))
Published
2025-09-19
Primary Topic
Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards system-aware governance of marine carbon dioxide removal: a review of interdependent challenges

L. Röschel
Publication Database IASS (Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS))
Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
article

Towards system-aware governance of marine carbon dioxide removal: a review of interdependent challenges

L. Röschel
article en

Abstract

Marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) is increasingly discussed as a potential climate response, yet its governance remains underdeveloped. This study conducts a structured literature review, following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses framework, to identify and analyse governance challenges associated with mCDR within the broader context of multilateral ocean governance. Using the socio–ecological–technological systems (SETSs) framework, challenges were systematically coded to capture interdependencies across social, ecological, and technological (S/E/T) domains. The analysis of 35 peer-reviewed publications identified 100 distinct governance challenges, revealing that most cannot be categorised within single-system domains. Instead, challenges frequently span intersections between S/E/T systems, highlighting issues such as fragmented governance structures, ecological risks from technological interventions, and legitimacy concerns linked to deployment. These findings underscore the systemic nature of mCDR governance challenges and the limitations of siloed governance approaches. The study demonstrates that applying a SETS perspective enables the identification of cross-domain trade-offs, synergies, and coordination gaps, supporting the development of system-aware governance frameworks for mCDR.

Publication Database IASS (Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS))
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.