Алгоритми призначення зовнішніх рецензентів для захисту PhD-дисертацій

We propose an approach to assigning external reviewers. In the proposed ap-proach, only the semantic similarity between applications and reviewers is tak-en into account; the similarity indices are assessed, and the necessary number of reviewers is assigned to ensure the maximum suitability level of the reviewers with the application, according to some criteria. We also perform a comparative analysis of various optimization algorithms using the criterion of “assignment quality–optimization time”. Experiments on the dataset showed that a reasona-ble balance between the “assignment quality” and “optimization time” criteria for the assignment of external reviewers can be achieved using a greedy algo-rithm without elitism or brute-force search on a truncated set of candidates. An application of the proposed algorithms improves the average quality of PhD committees by 13–34% across the entire dataset, depending on the algorithm used.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy
Published
2025-12-29
Primary Topic
Expert finding and Q&A systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Алгоритми призначення зовнішніх рецензентів для захисту PhD-дисертацій

Роман Резнік, Микола Петричко
The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy
Expert finding and Q&A systems
article

Алгоритми призначення зовнішніх рецензентів для захисту PhD-дисертацій

Роман Резнік, Микола Петричко
article en

Abstract

We propose an approach to assigning external reviewers. In the proposed ap-proach, only the semantic similarity between applications and reviewers is tak-en into account; the similarity indices are assessed, and the necessary number of reviewers is assigned to ensure the maximum suitability level of the reviewers with the application, according to some criteria. We also perform a comparative analysis of various optimization algorithms using the criterion of “assignment quality–optimization time”. Experiments on the dataset showed that a reasona-ble balance between the “assignment quality” and “optimization time” criteria for the assignment of external reviewers can be achieved using a greedy algo-rithm without elitism or brute-force search on a truncated set of candidates. An application of the proposed algorithms improves the average quality of PhD committees by 13–34% across the entire dataset, depending on the algorithm used.

The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Expert finding and Q&A systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Алгоритми призначення зовнішніх рецензентів для захисту PhD-дисертацій — Роман Резнік, Микола Петричко · The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS