An Introduction to Competing Risks in Epidemiology

Henrik Toft Sørensen,1,2 Erzsébet Horváth-Puhó,1 Janet L Peacock1,2 1Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Center for Population Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; 2Department of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USACorrespondence: Henrik Toft Sørensen, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Center for Population Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University, Olof Palmes Allé 43-45, Aarhus N, DK-8200, Denmark, Email [email protected]: Competing risks arise when people are at risk of multiple mutually exclusive events, such that the occurrence of one event alters the probability of others. In research, ignoring competing risks can lead to biased estimates. We outline key approaches for analyzing competing risk data, focusing on their assumptions, interpretations, and epidemiological and clinical relevance. The Aalen-Johansen estimator, a non-parametric method for estimating the cumulative incidence function, provides an alternative to the naïve Kaplan-Meier estimator when competing events are present. The cause-specific hazard model estimates the instantaneous risk of a specific event type, treating competing events as censored, and is used for etiologic research. The Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model directly models the cumulative incidence function, thus offering a clinically interpretable measure of absolute risk. We also discuss the use of composite endpoints, which combine several event types to increase statistical power, and highlight their limitations in clinical interpretation. By comparing these methods and illustrating their applications through analyses of the association between venous thromboembolism and arterial events, this review aims to guide researchers, particularly junior researchers, in selecting appropriate strategies for valid and meaningful analysis of competing risks in clinical and epidemiological studies.Keywords: competing risks, epidemiology, Aalen-Johansen estimator, cause-specific hazard model, fine-gray subdistribution hazard model

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Published
2026-02-02
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Introduction to Competing Risks in Epidemiology

Sørensen Ht, Erzsébet Horváth-Puhó, Janet Peacock
Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Statistical Methods and Inference
article

An Introduction to Competing Risks in Epidemiology

Sørensen Ht, Erzsébet Horváth-Puhó, Janet Peacock
article en

Abstract

Henrik Toft Sørensen,1,2 Erzsébet Horváth-Puhó,1 Janet L Peacock1,2 1Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Center for Population Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; 2Department of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USACorrespondence: Henrik Toft Sørensen, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Center for Population Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University, Olof Palmes Allé 43-45, Aarhus N, DK-8200, Denmark, Email [email protected]: Competing risks arise when people are at risk of multiple mutually exclusive events, such that the occurrence of one event alters the probability of others. In research, ignoring competing risks can lead to biased estimates. We outline key approaches for analyzing competing risk data, focusing on their assumptions, interpretations, and epidemiological and clinical relevance. The Aalen-Johansen estimator, a non-parametric method for estimating the cumulative incidence function, provides an alternative to the naïve Kaplan-Meier estimator when competing events are present. The cause-specific hazard model estimates the instantaneous risk of a specific event type, treating competing events as censored, and is used for etiologic research. The Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model directly models the cumulative incidence function, thus offering a clinically interpretable measure of absolute risk. We also discuss the use of composite endpoints, which combine several event types to increase statistical power, and highlight their limitations in clinical interpretation. By comparing these methods and illustrating their applications through analyses of the association between venous thromboembolism and arterial events, this review aims to guide researchers, particularly junior researchers, in selecting appropriate strategies for valid and meaningful analysis of competing risks in clinical and epidemiological studies.Keywords: competing risks, epidemiology, Aalen-Johansen estimator, cause-specific hazard model, fine-gray subdistribution hazard model

Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus Universitetshospital
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Statistical Methods and Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Introduction to Competing Risks in Epidemiology — Sørensen Ht, Erzsébet Horváth-Puhó, et al. · Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS