An interpretable AI system reduces false-positive MRI diagnoses by stratifying high-risk breast lesions

Breast cancer diagnosis using magnetic resonance imaging remains limited by high false-positive rates and substantial inter-reader variability, especially for lesions classified as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4, often leading to unnecessary biopsies. Here we show that the BI-RADS 4 Lesions Analysis System (BL4AS), an artificial intelligence system powered by foundation models and leveraging the rich spatiotemporal information of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, addresses these diagnostic challenges. Developed on a multicenter dataset of 2,803 lesions from 2,686 female patients, BL4AS demonstrates robust performance with areas under the curve of 0.892-0.930 and significantly outperforms radiologists in specificity (0.889 versus 0.491). BL4AS-assisted interpretation significantly improves diagnostic accuracy for both senior and junior radiologists, reducing inter-reader variability by 24.5% and decreasing false-positive rates by 27.3%. BL4AS further stratifies lesions into subcategories (4 A, 4B and 4 C) for refined risk assessment, offering a practical tool for precision breast cancer management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69212-7
Primary Topic
MRI in cancer diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An interpretable AI system reduces false-positive MRI diagnoses by stratifying high-risk breast lesions

Yuelang Zhang, Dai Yi, Chinting Wong, Zeyan Xu et al.
Nature Communications
MRI in cancer diagnosis
article

An interpretable AI system reduces false-positive MRI diagnoses by stratifying high-risk breast lesions

Yuelang Zhang, Dai Yi, Chinting Wong, Zeyan Xu, Yanting Liang, Zhitao Wei, Siyao DU, Kexin Chen, Yan Zhang, Zhenwei Shi, Changhong Liang, Weibo Gao, Ying Wang, Zaiyi Liu, Chu Han, Ke Han, Lina Zhang, Jiayi Liao
article en

Abstract

Breast cancer diagnosis using magnetic resonance imaging remains limited by high false-positive rates and substantial inter-reader variability, especially for lesions classified as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4, often leading to unnecessary biopsies. Here we show that the BI-RADS 4 Lesions Analysis System (BL4AS), an artificial intelligence system powered by foundation models and leveraging the rich spatiotemporal information of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, addresses these diagnostic challenges. Developed on a multicenter dataset of 2,803 lesions from 2,686 female patients, BL4AS demonstrates robust performance with areas under the curve of 0.892-0.930 and significantly outperforms radiologists in specificity (0.889 versus 0.491). BL4AS-assisted interpretation significantly improves diagnostic accuracy for both senior and junior radiologists, reducing inter-reader variability by 24.5% and decreasing false-positive rates by 27.3%. BL4AS further stratifies lesions into subcategories (4 A, 4B and 4 C) for refined risk assessment, offering a practical tool for precision breast cancer management.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 17(1)
Kunming Medical University (CN), Key Laboratory of Guangdong Province (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (CN), Peking University Shenzhen Hospital (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN), First Hospital of China Medical University (CN), Guangdong Province Women and Children Hospital (CN), Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences (CN), Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (CN), Southern Medical University (CN), China Medical University (CN), Guangzhou Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, National Science and Technology Major Project
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
MRI in cancer diagnosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.