No fault vaccine injury compensation after COVID-19: A systematic literature review and proposed typology

The COVID-19 pandemic brought about a unique and rapid period of global vaccine innovation. It revealed structural challenges not only in global vaccine affordability and distribution but in the liability and indemnity structures that can both impede access and affect fair outcomes for the small number of people who suffer severe side effects. This review examines vaccine injury and compensation mechanisms, including no-fault compensation schemes, aimed at addressing both the liability and indemnity concerns of developers and the compensation due those suffering severe side effects. The ultimate aim of the review is to provide a classification of systems for those countries that are considering adopting NFCS as part of their broader public health readiness and preparedness strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2026.2620849
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No fault vaccine injury compensation after COVID-19: A systematic literature review and proposed typology

Sam Halabi, Kashish Aneja, Katherine Ginsbach, Alison Durran et al.
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

No fault vaccine injury compensation after COVID-19: A systematic literature review and proposed typology

Sam Halabi, Kashish Aneja, Katherine Ginsbach, Alison Durran, Qianhan Qian, Nishtha Arora, Shabna Ummer
article en

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic brought about a unique and rapid period of global vaccine innovation. It revealed structural challenges not only in global vaccine affordability and distribution but in the liability and indemnity structures that can both impede access and affect fair outcomes for the small number of people who suffer severe side effects. This review examines vaccine injury and compensation mechanisms, including no-fault compensation schemes, aimed at addressing both the liability and indemnity concerns of developers and the compensation due those suffering severe side effects. The ultimate aim of the review is to provide a classification of systems for those countries that are considering adopting NFCS as part of their broader public health readiness and preparedness strategies.

Human Vaccines & ImmunotherapeuticsVol. 22(1)
Georgetown University (US), University of Washington (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.