S22-2: The Validation of Real-World Digital Mobility Outcomes

Purpose: Despite the increasing relevance of mobility impairment, there are no tools available to measure it in the real-world. The European Mobilise-D project developed 24 digital mobility outcomes (DMOs) to assess real-world mobility that target walking activity (amount, pattern) and gait (pace, rhythm, variability). The aim of this study was to validate these DMOs in patient populations. Methods: The DMOs were measured in 2,143 participants of the Mobilise-D prospective cohort study, including persons with Parkinson’s disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, multiple sclerosis, and after proximal femoral fracture, recruited from 17 sites in 10 countries and assessed every six months for two years. Construct validity was explored using Spearman/Pearson correlations and a-priory expectations. Ability to detect change was assessed by standardised response mean in strata defined by self-reported global impression of change and changes in constructs meaningful to patients. MIDs were triangulated using distribution- and anchor-based methods. Results: Three groups of DMOs were identified: 1) DMOs showing good construct validity and ability to detect change across all diseases and overall cohort (walking duration, number of steps, number of bouts of any duration or >10 s, average and maximum walking speed in longer bouts, stride length in longer bouts), 2) DMOs showing good construct validity and ability to detect change only in some diseases (number of walking bouts >30 and 60 s, bout to bout duration variability, walking speed in shorter bouts, stride length in shorter bouts, cadence in all and longer bouts, maximum cadence, walking speed bout to bout variability, stride length bout to bout variability), and 3) DMOs that exhibited generally poor results in construct validity (average and maximum bout duration, stride duration in shorter and longer bouts, cadence bout to bout variability, stride duration bout to bout variability). Conclusions: The developed and validated DMOs offer a new opportunity to evaluate real-world mobility and to target outcomes that go beyond amount of physical activity. Support/Funding Source: This project has received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No 820820. This Joint Undertaking receives support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and EFPIA (www.imi.europa.eu). Keywords: Digital mobility outcomes, real-world assessment, walking activity, gait, validation

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Baltic Journal of Sport and Health Sciences
Published
2026-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33607/bjshs.v5isupplement.2088
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S22-2: The Validation of Real-World Digital Mobility Outcomes

Julia Braun, Sarah Koch, Anja Frei, Joren Buekers et al.
Baltic Journal of Sport and Health Sciences
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

S22-2: The Validation of Real-World Digital Mobility Outcomes

Julia Braun, Sarah Koch, Anja Frei, Joren Buekers, Milo A Puhan, Judith Garcia-Aymerich, Michael Long
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Despite the increasing relevance of mobility impairment, there are no tools available to measure it in the real-world. The European Mobilise-D project developed 24 digital mobility outcomes (DMOs) to assess real-world mobility that target walking activity (amount, pattern) and gait (pace, rhythm, variability). The aim of this study was to validate these DMOs in patient populations. Methods: The DMOs were measured in 2,143 participants of the Mobilise-D prospective cohort study, including persons with Parkinson’s disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, multiple sclerosis, and after proximal femoral fracture, recruited from 17 sites in 10 countries and assessed every six months for two years. Construct validity was explored using Spearman/Pearson correlations and a-priory expectations. Ability to detect change was assessed by standardised response mean in strata defined by self-reported global impression of change and changes in constructs meaningful to patients. MIDs were triangulated using distribution- and anchor-based methods. Results: Three groups of DMOs were identified: 1) DMOs showing good construct validity and ability to detect change across all diseases and overall cohort (walking duration, number of steps, number of bouts of any duration or >10 s, average and maximum walking speed in longer bouts, stride length in longer bouts), 2) DMOs showing good construct validity and ability to detect change only in some diseases (number of walking bouts >30 and 60 s, bout to bout duration variability, walking speed in shorter bouts, stride length in shorter bouts, cadence in all and longer bouts, maximum cadence, walking speed bout to bout variability, stride length bout to bout variability), and 3) DMOs that exhibited generally poor results in construct validity (average and maximum bout duration, stride duration in shorter and longer bouts, cadence bout to bout variability, stride duration bout to bout variability). Conclusions: The developed and validated DMOs offer a new opportunity to evaluate real-world mobility and to target outcomes that go beyond amount of physical activity. Support/Funding Source: This project has received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No 820820. This Joint Undertaking receives support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and EFPIA (www.imi.europa.eu). Keywords: Digital mobility outcomes, real-world assessment, walking activity, gait, validation

Baltic Journal of Sport and Health SciencesVol. 5(Supplement)
University of Zurich (CH), Prevention Institute (US), Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ES), University of Sheffield (GB)
European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations, European Commission
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.