Blast resistance and damage evaluation of prefabricated lightweight high-strength concrete arches

This study investigates the blast resistance of prefabricated lightweight high-strength concrete (LWHSC) arches through field tests, theoretical analysis, and static validation. The dynamic response, and damage mechanisms, of prefabricated and monolithic LWHSC arches were evaluated under varying blast intensities. The key parameters, including pressure, displacement, velocity, acceleration, and rebar strain, were monitored. The residual bearing capacity was tested to quantify the damage. The results show that LWHSC significantly reduces self-weight while maintaining excellent bond performance with reinforcement under blast loads. Damage severity escalates markedly with decreasing scaled distance. This progression pinpoints the arch vault as the critical zone. Monolithic arches demonstrate superior performance, characterized by higher dynamic stiffness and damping. A damage classification standard based on residual capacity is proposed for rapid post-blast safety assessment. These findings offer critical insights for the blast-resistant design and evaluation of prefabricated LWHSC arches. • LWHSC arches reduce self-weight while maintaining excellent blast resistance. • Blast damage is depended on scaled distance and the arch vault is the critical zone. • Monolithic arches excel in blast resistance over prefabricated ones. • A practical damage classification standard based on residual bearing capacity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Construction and Building Materials
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2026.145440
Primary Topic
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blast resistance and damage evaluation of prefabricated lightweight high-strength concrete arches

Zhengyuan Yue, Ying Xu, Xinli Kong, Guoan Liu et al.
Construction and Building Materials
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
article

Blast resistance and damage evaluation of prefabricated lightweight high-strength concrete arches

Zhengyuan Yue, Ying Xu, Xinli Kong, Guoan Liu, Huguang He, Peng Wang, Wei Zhou
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the blast resistance of prefabricated lightweight high-strength concrete (LWHSC) arches through field tests, theoretical analysis, and static validation. The dynamic response, and damage mechanisms, of prefabricated and monolithic LWHSC arches were evaluated under varying blast intensities. The key parameters, including pressure, displacement, velocity, acceleration, and rebar strain, were monitored. The residual bearing capacity was tested to quantify the damage. The results show that LWHSC significantly reduces self-weight while maintaining excellent bond performance with reinforcement under blast loads. Damage severity escalates markedly with decreasing scaled distance. This progression pinpoints the arch vault as the critical zone. Monolithic arches demonstrate superior performance, characterized by higher dynamic stiffness and damping. A damage classification standard based on residual capacity is proposed for rapid post-blast safety assessment. These findings offer critical insights for the blast-resistant design and evaluation of prefabricated LWHSC arches. • LWHSC arches reduce self-weight while maintaining excellent blast resistance. • Blast damage is depended on scaled distance and the arch vault is the critical zone. • Monolithic arches excel in blast resistance over prefabricated ones. • A practical damage classification standard based on residual bearing capacity.

Construction and Building MaterialsVol. 513
Academy of Military Medical Sciences (CN), PLA Army Engineering University (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.