Beyond Beliefs: Understanding Instructor Framing and the Uptake of Educational Technology in Engineering Education

Often expressed teacher beliefs are misaligned with observed instructional practices. We propose that instructor beliefs do not solely exist as isolated entities within instructors’ minds, but that instructors’ classroom decisions and actions are thoroughly linked with the environment in which they teach. As part of a larger study, we conducted interviews from three experienced instructors, each in different undergraduate engineering contexts. Utilizing the theory of resources and frames, we explored how they organized instructional resources into frames and how that framing interacted with their use of educational technology. We found significant differences in the framings and associated differences with how they integrated a new technological tool in their classes. We identify implications for teacher professional development, in particular the importance of attending to context and giving teachers agency in professional development and learning community settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16020221
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Beliefs: Understanding Instructor Framing and the Uptake of Educational Technology in Engineering Education

John Galisky, Amanda C. Emberley, Brian Self, Milo Koretsky
Education Sciences
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Beyond Beliefs: Understanding Instructor Framing and the Uptake of Educational Technology in Engineering Education

John Galisky, Amanda C. Emberley, Brian Self, Milo Koretsky
article en

Abstract

Often expressed teacher beliefs are misaligned with observed instructional practices. We propose that instructor beliefs do not solely exist as isolated entities within instructors’ minds, but that instructors’ classroom decisions and actions are thoroughly linked with the environment in which they teach. As part of a larger study, we conducted interviews from three experienced instructors, each in different undergraduate engineering contexts. Utilizing the theory of resources and frames, we explored how they organized instructional resources into frames and how that framing interacted with their use of educational technology. We found significant differences in the framings and associated differences with how they integrated a new technological tool in their classes. We identify implications for teacher professional development, in particular the importance of attending to context and giving teachers agency in professional development and learning community settings.

Education SciencesVol. 16(2)
Tufts University (US), California Polytechnic State University (US), University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
National Science Foundation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.