Intra- and Inter-Limb Isokinetic Strength Asymmetry in Competitive Judokas: Differences in Magnitude Across Competition Levels and Sex

Purpose: Inter-limb asymmetry is generally perceived by practitioners to increase injury risk and reduce sport performance. However, it remains unclear whether the magnitude of these asymmetries differs between judokas of varying competitive levels and sexes, potentially increasing the risk of injury or performance decline in certain groups. Therefore, this cross-sectional study aimed to examine differences in the magnitude of lower intra- and inter-limb asymmetry across competitive levels (i.e. regional, national, and international) and between sexes in competitive judokas. Methods: The magnitude of lower intra-limb (i.e. hamstring/quadriceps ratio [H/Q]) and inter-limb (i.e. quadriceps/quadriceps ratio [Q/Q], hamstring/hamstring ratio [H/H], hamstring/quadriceps:hamstring/quadriceps ratio [H/Q:H/Q], and percentage difference method [PDM] for knee extension and flexion) isokinetic strength asymmetry was assessed in 30 male and 24 female judokas aged 14–58 years. Range of motion was individually set, spanning from maximal knee flexion to maximal knee extension. The angular velocity was set at 90°/sec. To assess differences in descriptive characteristics, as well as intra- and inter-limb asymmetry across competitive levels and sex, a two-way ANOVA was conducted. If significant main effects or interactions were found, post hoc pairwise comparisons were performed using Tukey’s test. In cases where normality assumptions were violated, non-parametric alternatives were used: the Kruskal–Wallis H test for competitive-level comparisons for males and females separately, and the Mann–Whitney U test for post hoc analysis of the Kruskal–Wallis H test or sex-based differences. Results: No significant differences in the H/Q ratio, H/H ratio, Q/Q ratio, H/Q:H/Q ratio, or PDM for knee extension and flexion were found across competitive levels (p = 0.403–0.979). However, male judokas showed a significant Q/Q difference (p = 0.035), with international athletes (97.00 ± 3.34) having lower values than regional (92.59 ± 4.64, p = 0.032) and national (90.86 ± 7.18, p = 0.026) judokas. No significant sex-based differences in asymmetry were observed (p = 0.467–0.774). Conclusion: Since most asymmetry indices did not significantly vary by competitive level or sex, and overall asymmetry magnitudes were relatively low, reducing lower limb asymmetry with regard to injury prevention and sport performance may not be a priority for male and female judokas at any level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Baltic Journal of Sport and Health Sciences
Published
2026-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33607/bjshs.v5isupplement.1856
Primary Topic
Sports injuries and prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intra- and Inter-Limb Isokinetic Strength Asymmetry in Competitive Judokas: Differences in Magnitude Across Competition Levels and Sex

Laurent Chapelle, Tijl Lindekens, Joachim D'Hondt, Liese Bosman et al.
Baltic Journal of Sport and Health Sciences
Sports injuries and prevention
article

Intra- and Inter-Limb Isokinetic Strength Asymmetry in Competitive Judokas: Differences in Magnitude Across Competition Levels and Sex

Laurent Chapelle, Tijl Lindekens, Joachim D'Hondt, Liese Bosman, Brecht Pletinckx, Peter Clarys, Marie Sadouni
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Inter-limb asymmetry is generally perceived by practitioners to increase injury risk and reduce sport performance. However, it remains unclear whether the magnitude of these asymmetries differs between judokas of varying competitive levels and sexes, potentially increasing the risk of injury or performance decline in certain groups. Therefore, this cross-sectional study aimed to examine differences in the magnitude of lower intra- and inter-limb asymmetry across competitive levels (i.e. regional, national, and international) and between sexes in competitive judokas. Methods: The magnitude of lower intra-limb (i.e. hamstring/quadriceps ratio [H/Q]) and inter-limb (i.e. quadriceps/quadriceps ratio [Q/Q], hamstring/hamstring ratio [H/H], hamstring/quadriceps:hamstring/quadriceps ratio [H/Q:H/Q], and percentage difference method [PDM] for knee extension and flexion) isokinetic strength asymmetry was assessed in 30 male and 24 female judokas aged 14–58 years. Range of motion was individually set, spanning from maximal knee flexion to maximal knee extension. The angular velocity was set at 90°/sec. To assess differences in descriptive characteristics, as well as intra- and inter-limb asymmetry across competitive levels and sex, a two-way ANOVA was conducted. If significant main effects or interactions were found, post hoc pairwise comparisons were performed using Tukey’s test. In cases where normality assumptions were violated, non-parametric alternatives were used: the Kruskal–Wallis H test for competitive-level comparisons for males and females separately, and the Mann–Whitney U test for post hoc analysis of the Kruskal–Wallis H test or sex-based differences. Results: No significant differences in the H/Q ratio, H/H ratio, Q/Q ratio, H/Q:H/Q ratio, or PDM for knee extension and flexion were found across competitive levels (p = 0.403–0.979). However, male judokas showed a significant Q/Q difference (p = 0.035), with international athletes (97.00 ± 3.34) having lower values than regional (92.59 ± 4.64, p = 0.032) and national (90.86 ± 7.18, p = 0.026) judokas. No significant sex-based differences in asymmetry were observed (p = 0.467–0.774). Conclusion: Since most asymmetry indices did not significantly vary by competitive level or sex, and overall asymmetry magnitudes were relatively low, reducing lower limb asymmetry with regard to injury prevention and sport performance may not be a priority for male and female judokas at any level.

Baltic Journal of Sport and Health SciencesVol. 5(Supplement)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Sports injuries and prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.