The Course That Vico Ran: The Significance of the Completed Critical Edition of the <i>Scienza Nuova</i>

As interest in the thought of Giambattista Vico increases worldwide, the completion of the critical edition of his Scienza Nuova , in its successive versions of 1725, 1730, and 1744, provides an opportunity to reassess the compositional, textual, and editorial history of the work, and to ask further questions about the work’s evolution. This article first outlines the course of the work’s composition, highlighting the complex history of the 1725 version, and the rapidity and extent of the rewriting which resulted in the version of 1730. It reviews the earlier editions of the Scienza Nuova by Ferrari and Nicolini, both of whom subordinated the 1730 version to that of 1744. The critical edition, by contrast, affirms the independence of all three versions: the article outlines the problems involved in editing each of them. It ends by opening up the question: what was Vico doing when he rewrote the work in 1730?

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Modern Intellectual History
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1479244325100413
Primary Topic
Giambattista Vico and Joyce
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Course That Vico Ran: The Significance of the Completed Critical Edition of the Scienza Nuova

John Robertson
Modern Intellectual History
Giambattista Vico and Joyce
article

The Course That Vico Ran: The Significance of the Completed Critical Edition of the Scienza Nuova

John Robertson
article en

Abstract

As interest in the thought of Giambattista Vico increases worldwide, the completion of the critical edition of his Scienza Nuova , in its successive versions of 1725, 1730, and 1744, provides an opportunity to reassess the compositional, textual, and editorial history of the work, and to ask further questions about the work’s evolution. This article first outlines the course of the work’s composition, highlighting the complex history of the 1725 version, and the rapidity and extent of the rewriting which resulted in the version of 1730. It reviews the earlier editions of the Scienza Nuova by Ferrari and Nicolini, both of whom subordinated the 1730 version to that of 1744. The critical edition, by contrast, affirms the independence of all three versions: the article outlines the problems involved in editing each of them. It ends by opening up the question: what was Vico doing when he rewrote the work in 1730?

Modern Intellectual History
University of Cambridge (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Giambattista Vico and Joyce
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.