Conflict Management and Bullying at School: What do Families Have to Say About it?

This study aims to identify how families understand and manage conflict and bullying, as their perspectives on these issues directly influence school coexistence and the construction of a more peaceful society. We examine the views of 1,480 fathers, mothers, and legal guardians with children in compulsory education (6 to 16 years old) in Catalonia. The research is quantitative, with a post-hoc approach, and complemented by qualitative elements. We processed the data using SPSS and conducted descriptive and correlational analyses to identify trends, patterns, and relationships among the studied variables. Non-parametric tests (Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis) were used. Families tend to endorse compromise and negotiation (M=3.04), flexibility and partial yielding (M=3.01), and talking (M=2.62). They reject “letting time pass” (M=2.39). No significant differences in conflict-management items were found by sex. By age, differences emerged for encouraging force (item 37, p = .031) and setting rules (item 41, p = .014), with higher means among those <30. Several items differed by educational level: item 36 (p = .001); items 37, 40, and 41 (p < .001); item 42 (p = .008); and item 43 (p < .001). Approximately one-third of families consider bullying victims to be weak or to have difficulty interacting with others. Specifically, 26.7% reported direct experience with bullying at home, and men scored higher on the statement “it’s just jokes” (item 44, p<.001). Education level was associated with victim-blaming (item 45, p < .001) and the belief that “my child would tell me” (item 46, p < .001; overall M = 2.86). This recent population snapshot is novel because it links family conflict management styles with bullying beliefs disaggregated by sex, age, and education. Practical implications prioritise parent training, school–family protocols, and campaigns that de-normalise “just jokes,” with a focus on younger families and lower educational levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Futurity Education
Published
2025-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57125/fed.2025.12.06
Primary Topic
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conflict Management and Bullying at School: What do Families Have to Say About it?

Dolors Ribalta Alcalde, Montserrat Alguacil de Nicolás, M. Carme Boqué Torremorell, Laura García-Raga
Futurity Education
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
article

Conflict Management and Bullying at School: What do Families Have to Say About it?

Dolors Ribalta Alcalde, Montserrat Alguacil de Nicolás, M. Carme Boqué Torremorell, Laura García-Raga
article en

Abstract

This study aims to identify how families understand and manage conflict and bullying, as their perspectives on these issues directly influence school coexistence and the construction of a more peaceful society. We examine the views of 1,480 fathers, mothers, and legal guardians with children in compulsory education (6 to 16 years old) in Catalonia. The research is quantitative, with a post-hoc approach, and complemented by qualitative elements. We processed the data using SPSS and conducted descriptive and correlational analyses to identify trends, patterns, and relationships among the studied variables. Non-parametric tests (Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis) were used. Families tend to endorse compromise and negotiation (M=3.04), flexibility and partial yielding (M=3.01), and talking (M=2.62). They reject “letting time pass” (M=2.39). No significant differences in conflict-management items were found by sex. By age, differences emerged for encouraging force (item 37, p = .031) and setting rules (item 41, p = .014), with higher means among those <30. Several items differed by educational level: item 36 (p = .001); items 37, 40, and 41 (p < .001); item 42 (p = .008); and item 43 (p < .001). Approximately one-third of families consider bullying victims to be weak or to have difficulty interacting with others. Specifically, 26.7% reported direct experience with bullying at home, and men scored higher on the statement “it’s just jokes” (item 44, p<.001). Education level was associated with victim-blaming (item 45, p < .001) and the belief that “my child would tell me” (item 46, p < .001; overall M = 2.86). This recent population snapshot is novel because it links family conflict management styles with bullying beliefs disaggregated by sex, age, and education. Practical implications prioritise parent training, school–family protocols, and campaigns that de-normalise “just jokes,” with a focus on younger families and lower educational levels.

Futurity EducationVol. 5(4)
Universitat de València (ES), Universitat Ramon Llull (ES)
Universitat Ramon Llull, Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.