Physical Activity Monitoring in Portugal: Looking for a Surveillance System

Purpose: This study aimed to analyse the state-of-play of physical activity (PA) surveillance in Portugal. Studies assessing population-level PA were evaluated for their potential to be considered PA surveillance systems (SS) based on their compliance with defined quality criteria. Methods: A literature search was conducted to identify studies assessing population-level PA in Portugal. Ten quality criteria for PA SS were defined: 1) use of a scientifically validated instrument; 2) repeated measurements over time; 3) assessment of all age groups across the lifespan; 4) use of a nationally representative sample; 5) combination of self-reported data (questionnaires) with objective measures (accelerometers); 6) assessment of PA contexts; 7) collection of sedentary behaviour data; 8) use of the World Health Organization’s cut-off points for sufficient PA levels; 9) interpretation of results based on sociodemographic variables; and 10) public accessibility and dissemination of results. Identified studies were evaluated for compliance with these criteria. Results: Ten studies were identified and assessed. None of the studies met all quality criteria. Criteria 1) was met by 90% of the studies; 2) 80%; 3) 0%; 4) 50%; 5) 10%; 6) 80%; 7) 100%; 8) 30%; 9) 100%; 10) 100%. Conclusion: A considerable number of studies assess PA levels in the Portuguese population, some within similar contexts but using different methodologies, leading to inconsistent and difficult-to-compare results. The quality assessment framework used may be applied in other countries to evaluate their data sources. If applied across countries, this framework could support the harmonisation of surveillance practices and enhance comparability, while also contributing to broader international monitoring efforts. In both Portugal and internationally, addressing the identified gaps (specially criteria 3, 4, 5, and 8) is essential to improve PA monitoring. These findings highlight the urgent need for a unified SS to monitor PA in Portugal, enabling more effective evaluation of health promotion policies. Support/Funding Source: FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [Foundation for Science and Technology], UIDB/04750/2020 and LA/P/0064/2020.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Baltic Journal of Sport and Health Sciences
Published
2026-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33607/bjshs.v5isupplement.1880
Primary Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physical Activity Monitoring in Portugal: Looking for a Surveillance System

Bruno Soares Rodrigues, Romeu Mendes, Juliana Pereira
Baltic Journal of Sport and Health Sciences
Physical Activity and Health
article

Physical Activity Monitoring in Portugal: Looking for a Surveillance System

Bruno Soares Rodrigues, Romeu Mendes, Juliana Pereira
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to analyse the state-of-play of physical activity (PA) surveillance in Portugal. Studies assessing population-level PA were evaluated for their potential to be considered PA surveillance systems (SS) based on their compliance with defined quality criteria. Methods: A literature search was conducted to identify studies assessing population-level PA in Portugal. Ten quality criteria for PA SS were defined: 1) use of a scientifically validated instrument; 2) repeated measurements over time; 3) assessment of all age groups across the lifespan; 4) use of a nationally representative sample; 5) combination of self-reported data (questionnaires) with objective measures (accelerometers); 6) assessment of PA contexts; 7) collection of sedentary behaviour data; 8) use of the World Health Organization’s cut-off points for sufficient PA levels; 9) interpretation of results based on sociodemographic variables; and 10) public accessibility and dissemination of results. Identified studies were evaluated for compliance with these criteria. Results: Ten studies were identified and assessed. None of the studies met all quality criteria. Criteria 1) was met by 90% of the studies; 2) 80%; 3) 0%; 4) 50%; 5) 10%; 6) 80%; 7) 100%; 8) 30%; 9) 100%; 10) 100%. Conclusion: A considerable number of studies assess PA levels in the Portuguese population, some within similar contexts but using different methodologies, leading to inconsistent and difficult-to-compare results. The quality assessment framework used may be applied in other countries to evaluate their data sources. If applied across countries, this framework could support the harmonisation of surveillance practices and enhance comparability, while also contributing to broader international monitoring efforts. In both Portugal and internationally, addressing the identified gaps (specially criteria 3, 4, 5, and 8) is essential to improve PA monitoring. These findings highlight the urgent need for a unified SS to monitor PA in Portugal, enabling more effective evaluation of health promotion policies. Support/Funding Source: FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [Foundation for Science and Technology], UIDB/04750/2020 and LA/P/0064/2020.

Baltic Journal of Sport and Health SciencesVol. 5(Supplement)
University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (PT), Universidade do Porto (PT), Life Quality Research Centre (PT)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Physical Activity and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.