Clinical performance of BioCoat™ and Fissurit FX: a randomized 18-month split-mouth study

Pit and fissure sealants (PFS) are effective in preventing occlusal caries. This randomized split-mouth clinical study aimed to compare the 18-month clinical performance of the bioactive resin-based PFS (BioCoat™) with a fluoride-containing conventional resin-based PFS (Fissurit FX) and to assess the influence of patient-related factors on material success. Sixty-three pediatric patients (aged 7-9) requiring non-invasive PFS were included. BioCoat™ (Group 1) and Fissurit FX (Group 2) were applied to contralateral mandibular permanent first molars. Clinical evaluations were performed at 3rd, 6th, 9th, 12th, and 18th months using modified USPHS criteria. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and logistic regression were applied. At 18 months, success rates were 90.2% for BioCoat™ and 88.2% for Fissurit FX, with no statistically significant difference between groups (p > 0.05). Both materials showed similar performance in marginal discoloration-adaptation, retention and secondary caries (p > 0.05). Median survival times were 17.72 months (BioCoat™) and 17.49 months (Fissurit FX), showing no significant difference (p = 0.744). No significant effect of patient-related factors on material success was determined (p > 0.05). BioCoat™ demonstrated comparable long-term clinical performance to Fissurit FX. Its bioactive properties may provide additional preventive benefits, supporting its safe use in pediatric dentistry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Odontology
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-026-01332-4
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical performance of BioCoat™ and Fissurit FX: a randomized 18-month split-mouth study

Esra Ergün, Canan Bayraktar Nahir
Odontology
Dental materials and restorations
article

Clinical performance of BioCoat™ and Fissurit FX: a randomized 18-month split-mouth study

Esra Ergün, Canan Bayraktar Nahir
article en

Abstract

Pit and fissure sealants (PFS) are effective in preventing occlusal caries. This randomized split-mouth clinical study aimed to compare the 18-month clinical performance of the bioactive resin-based PFS (BioCoat™) with a fluoride-containing conventional resin-based PFS (Fissurit FX) and to assess the influence of patient-related factors on material success. Sixty-three pediatric patients (aged 7-9) requiring non-invasive PFS were included. BioCoat™ (Group 1) and Fissurit FX (Group 2) were applied to contralateral mandibular permanent first molars. Clinical evaluations were performed at 3rd, 6th, 9th, 12th, and 18th months using modified USPHS criteria. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and logistic regression were applied. At 18 months, success rates were 90.2% for BioCoat™ and 88.2% for Fissurit FX, with no statistically significant difference between groups (p > 0.05). Both materials showed similar performance in marginal discoloration-adaptation, retention and secondary caries (p > 0.05). Median survival times were 17.72 months (BioCoat™) and 17.49 months (Fissurit FX), showing no significant difference (p = 0.744). No significant effect of patient-related factors on material success was determined (p > 0.05). BioCoat™ demonstrated comparable long-term clinical performance to Fissurit FX. Its bioactive properties may provide additional preventive benefits, supporting its safe use in pediatric dentistry.

Odontology
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.