Drivers of wolf depredation reporting and compensation use intentions by livestock producers
Perceptions of how commonly other producers were reporting wolf depredation (descriptive norms) and worry about future wolf depredation (perceptions of risk probability) were the strongest predictors of reporting intention. A lack of trust in state agencies, perceived financial risk without access to depredation compensation, descriptive norms, attitudes, age, and producer state of residence were the strongest predictors of compensation use intention. Our findings suggest that reducing operational financial vulnerability, building trust in agency personnel, and peer-to-peer knowledge sharing may be effective strategies for increasing reporting and compensation use. Though our sample size was relatively small, our results are informative and have important implications for compensation programs and reporting.
Authors
- Rebecca M. Niemiec (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7561-8951)
- Alexandra P. Few
- Stewart W. Breck (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3138-1929)
- Dana L. Hoag (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7660-6832)
- Rae Nickerson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2642-754X)
- P. P. Evangelista
Institutions
- Colorado Parks and Wildlife (US)
- Life Services (United States) (US)
- Jackson College (US)
- Colorado State University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PeerJ
- Published
- 2026-02-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.20732
- Primary Topic
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00