Population‐Based Melanoma Screening Using Integrated Risk Scores in Australia: A Narrative Review to Determine Readiness

Melanoma represents a significant burden on the Australian healthcare system and early detection is crucial to improve patient and health system outcomes. Experts suggest that targeted screening for high-risk individuals could lead to more efficient use of healthcare resources. Integrated risk scores combine polygenic risk scores (PRS) and non-genetic risk factors to offer the best performance for melanoma risk stratification. However, the feasibility of using integrated risk scores on a population basis to identify those at highest risk has yet to be evaluated. This narrative review aimed to identify evidence gaps and key issues to be addressed to support implementation of melanoma integrated risk scores on a population-based scale in Australia. Findings highlighted the following research and infrastructure needs: understand the progression rate of melanoma in situ to invasive disease; define who should be offered integrated risk scores; address performance issues across ancestries; develop clearly defined risk thresholds and corresponding clinical advice; and investigate clinical utility and impact of receiving integrated risk scores. Furthermore, screening programmes will require: equitable access to post-screening care; guidelines and quality standards for generating PRS and integrated risk scores; healthcare rebates for PRS testing; infrastructure for computational and data storage needs; workforce training and clinical decision support resources; clearer protections around PRS use in risk-rated insurances; and clear plans for programme quality and performance management. In conclusion, integrated risk scores have potential to facilitate targeted high-risk melanoma screening in Australia. However, there are significant evidence and infrastructure gaps that must be addressed before programme implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Medical Journal of Australia
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.70133
Primary Topic
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Population‐Based Melanoma Screening Using Integrated Risk Scores in Australia: A Narrative Review to Determine Readiness

Tatiane Yanes, Courtney K. Wallingford, Tamara Dawson, Chloe E. Mighton et al.
The Medical Journal of Australia
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
article

Population‐Based Melanoma Screening Using Integrated Risk Scores in Australia: A Narrative Review to Determine Readiness

Tatiane Yanes, Courtney K. Wallingford, Tamara Dawson, Chloe E. Mighton, Yvonne Bombard, Aideen McInerney‐Leo, H. Peter Soyer, Anne Cust
article en

Abstract

Melanoma represents a significant burden on the Australian healthcare system and early detection is crucial to improve patient and health system outcomes. Experts suggest that targeted screening for high-risk individuals could lead to more efficient use of healthcare resources. Integrated risk scores combine polygenic risk scores (PRS) and non-genetic risk factors to offer the best performance for melanoma risk stratification. However, the feasibility of using integrated risk scores on a population basis to identify those at highest risk has yet to be evaluated. This narrative review aimed to identify evidence gaps and key issues to be addressed to support implementation of melanoma integrated risk scores on a population-based scale in Australia. Findings highlighted the following research and infrastructure needs: understand the progression rate of melanoma in situ to invasive disease; define who should be offered integrated risk scores; address performance issues across ancestries; develop clearly defined risk thresholds and corresponding clinical advice; and investigate clinical utility and impact of receiving integrated risk scores. Furthermore, screening programmes will require: equitable access to post-screening care; guidelines and quality standards for generating PRS and integrated risk scores; healthcare rebates for PRS testing; infrastructure for computational and data storage needs; workforce training and clinical decision support resources; clearer protections around PRS use in risk-rated insurances; and clear plans for programme quality and performance management. In conclusion, integrated risk scores have potential to facilitate targeted high-risk melanoma screening in Australia. However, there are significant evidence and infrastructure gaps that must be addressed before programme implementation.

The Medical Journal of AustraliaVol. 224(2)
The University of Queensland (AU), Princess Alexandra Hospital (AU), St Michael’s Hospital (IE), Melanoma Institute Australia (AU), Skin and Cancer Foundation (AU), Cancer Council NSW (AU)
Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.