Navigating just transitions: Trade union strategies and climate delay in North Sea energy politics

This article investigates conditions under which just transition (JT) – a union concept reconciling worker protection with environmental imperatives – becomes entangled in the dynamics of climate delay within North Sea energy politics. Drawing on interviews with trade union representatives and environmental actors in Norway and the UK, we examine how unions navigate energy transitions through strategies that both reinforce and challenge climate delay. Our analysis reveals a critical paradox: both institutionalised inclusion (Norway) and exclusion (UK) lead to delay through different mechanisms. Norwegian unions, embedded within corporatist arrangements, maintain consensus against timetabled phaseout through strategic avoidance. UK exclusion produces fragmented union strategies and undermines implementation and trust. Yet neither outcome is fixed: UK fragmentation creates insurgent potential; Norwegian consensus masks emerging divisions. These dynamics – shaped by historical experiences, structural positioning and institutional constraints – underscore unions' contradictory capacity to either reproduce fossil capital relations or challenge them through coordinated labour strategies and cross-movement coalitions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Earth System Governance
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2026.100316
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating just transitions: Trade union strategies and climate delay in North Sea energy politics

Tomas Maltby, Steven J. Harry
Earth System Governance
Labor Movements and Unions
article

Navigating just transitions: Trade union strategies and climate delay in North Sea energy politics

Tomas Maltby, Steven J. Harry
article en

Abstract

This article investigates conditions under which just transition (JT) – a union concept reconciling worker protection with environmental imperatives – becomes entangled in the dynamics of climate delay within North Sea energy politics. Drawing on interviews with trade union representatives and environmental actors in Norway and the UK, we examine how unions navigate energy transitions through strategies that both reinforce and challenge climate delay. Our analysis reveals a critical paradox: both institutionalised inclusion (Norway) and exclusion (UK) lead to delay through different mechanisms. Norwegian unions, embedded within corporatist arrangements, maintain consensus against timetabled phaseout through strategic avoidance. UK exclusion produces fragmented union strategies and undermines implementation and trust. Yet neither outcome is fixed: UK fragmentation creates insurgent potential; Norwegian consensus masks emerging divisions. These dynamics – shaped by historical experiences, structural positioning and institutional constraints – underscore unions' contradictory capacity to either reproduce fossil capital relations or challenge them through coordinated labour strategies and cross-movement coalitions.

Earth System GovernanceVol. 27
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Labor Movements and Unions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.