Generative deliberation as anticipatory practice: building socially robust knowledge for responsible research and innovation

Anticipation is a critically important dimension of responsible research and innovation (RRI) and can help shape research and innovation pathways. However, how anticipation is realized in practice is a relatively undertheorized territory. Our aim is to offer some clarity on how practitioners might think more concretely about the contributions of anticipatory practices, such as stakeholder workshops. In this article, we utilize the concept of `socially robust knowledge' as part of the foundation of what responsible research and innovation is built upon. Drawing upon the research work from subfields such as RRI, STS, deliberative democracy, and our own practitioner experiences, we argue for deliberative discussion within stakeholder engagement workshops as an ideal site for generating socially robust knowledge. We propose a framework for what we term `generative' deliberation as ideal for anticipatory engagement and offer an empirical analysis of two anticipatory workshops that highlights features of this generative deliberation in action.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Responsible Innovation
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2026.2620231
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative deliberation as anticipatory practice: building socially robust knowledge for responsible research and innovation

Dalton George, Jason A. Delborne
Journal of Responsible Innovation
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Generative deliberation as anticipatory practice: building socially robust knowledge for responsible research and innovation

Dalton George, Jason A. Delborne
article en

Abstract

Anticipation is a critically important dimension of responsible research and innovation (RRI) and can help shape research and innovation pathways. However, how anticipation is realized in practice is a relatively undertheorized territory. Our aim is to offer some clarity on how practitioners might think more concretely about the contributions of anticipatory practices, such as stakeholder workshops. In this article, we utilize the concept of `socially robust knowledge' as part of the foundation of what responsible research and innovation is built upon. Drawing upon the research work from subfields such as RRI, STS, deliberative democracy, and our own practitioner experiences, we argue for deliberative discussion within stakeholder engagement workshops as an ideal site for generating socially robust knowledge. We propose a framework for what we term `generative' deliberation as ideal for anticipatory engagement and offer an empirical analysis of two anticipatory workshops that highlights features of this generative deliberation in action.

Journal of Responsible InnovationVol. 13(1)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Arizona State University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Generative deliberation as anticipatory practice: building socially robust knowledge for responsible research and innovation — Dalton George, Jason A. Delborne · Journal of Responsible Innovation (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS