Sourcing the origins of carnelian in early Chinese civilizations

Carnelian beads in high-status burials of the Western Zhou period (ca. 1000-800 BCE) have long been seen as key evidence for long-distance exchange between East Asia and regions to the west, while their geological origins and circulation pathways have remained poorly constrained. Using a newly established geochemical database of 300 geological samples from 27 potential sources across Asia, we conducted trace-element analyses of 11 carnelian beads from the Sanxingdui pits (ca. 1200-1000 BCE), Sichuan Basin, southwest China. Canonical discriminant analysis indicates that the raw materials of these carnelian beads do not primarily derive from south China, but the Yanshan Orogeny, Central Asian Orogenic Belt and some unknown sources that might be close to Hexi Corridor, pointing to raw-material sources located over 1,000 km to the north of the Sichuan Basin. Comparative analyses of contemporaneous beads from Gansu, Shaanxi, and Beijing show similar northern provenance signatures, suggesting a broad and persistent exchange sphere spanning the southern Mongolian Plateau, Loess Plateau, eastern Tibetan Plateau, Central Plains, and Sichuan Basin between 1500-1000 BCE. Our results provide the earliest direct geochemical evidence for long-distance carnelian exchange in Bronze Age China and demonstrate the value of integrating geochemical sourcing with archaeological context to reconstruct ancient interaction networks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2524563123
Primary Topic
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sourcing the origins of carnelian in early Chinese civilizations

Chunlei Qin, Zhanwei Sun, Jonathan Mark Kenoyer, Zhenbin Xie et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
article

Sourcing the origins of carnelian in early Chinese civilizations

Chunlei Qin, Zhanwei Sun, Jonathan Mark Kenoyer, Zhenbin Xie, Zihua Tang, Jian Yu, Ruilin Mao, Hongye Han, Meiting Yan, Chong Wang, Jiancheng Liu, Fei Tang, Honglin Ran, Xiaoguang Li
article en

Abstract

Carnelian beads in high-status burials of the Western Zhou period (ca. 1000-800 BCE) have long been seen as key evidence for long-distance exchange between East Asia and regions to the west, while their geological origins and circulation pathways have remained poorly constrained. Using a newly established geochemical database of 300 geological samples from 27 potential sources across Asia, we conducted trace-element analyses of 11 carnelian beads from the Sanxingdui pits (ca. 1200-1000 BCE), Sichuan Basin, southwest China. Canonical discriminant analysis indicates that the raw materials of these carnelian beads do not primarily derive from south China, but the Yanshan Orogeny, Central Asian Orogenic Belt and some unknown sources that might be close to Hexi Corridor, pointing to raw-material sources located over 1,000 km to the north of the Sichuan Basin. Comparative analyses of contemporaneous beads from Gansu, Shaanxi, and Beijing show similar northern provenance signatures, suggesting a broad and persistent exchange sphere spanning the southern Mongolian Plateau, Loess Plateau, eastern Tibetan Plateau, Central Plains, and Sichuan Basin between 1500-1000 BCE. Our results provide the earliest direct geochemical evidence for long-distance carnelian exchange in Bronze Age China and demonstrate the value of integrating geochemical sourcing with archaeological context to reconstruct ancient interaction networks.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 123(7)
Planetary Science Institute (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), China University of Geosciences (CN), China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN), Institute of Archaeology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), Beijing Museum of Natural History (CN), Yunnan Archaeology (CN), Shanxi Museum (CN), Institute of Archaeology (CN), Henan Provincial Institute of Cultural Heritage and Archaeology (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.