Towards a Resilient and Defensible Heritage Management Regime for Local Communities: Methodological Considerations and a Worked Example

The management of tangible cultural heritage assets in the framing of the authorised cultural heritage discourse entails the identification, documentation, and evaluation of sites for their cultural heritage significance and their subsequent recognition in government-authorised heritage lists. This inscription enables the imposition of administrative controls and protective instruments that inhibit development actions that may impact the integrity of the asset and enable management interventions to limit the detrimental effects of environmental decay. While the listing generates a static entity, the values that underlie the heritage assessment that led to the listing are mutable qualities, as are the cultural, social, and economic conditions in which the heritage is embedded. Given the mutability, often due to intergenerational change, there is a need to review the heritage lists so that they remain fit for purpose. This paper outlines a methodology to assess the universe of heritage assets in a heritage register to arrive at a resilient and, in particular, defensible heritage management regime. A case study, conducted in Albury, NSW (Australia), exemplifies the methodological approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Science
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci10020084
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
38.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a Resilient and Defensible Heritage Management Regime for Local Communities: Methodological Considerations and a Worked Example

Dirk H. R. Spennemann
1 citations
Urban Science
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
38.88
article

Towards a Resilient and Defensible Heritage Management Regime for Local Communities: Methodological Considerations and a Worked Example

Dirk H. R. Spennemann
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The management of tangible cultural heritage assets in the framing of the authorised cultural heritage discourse entails the identification, documentation, and evaluation of sites for their cultural heritage significance and their subsequent recognition in government-authorised heritage lists. This inscription enables the imposition of administrative controls and protective instruments that inhibit development actions that may impact the integrity of the asset and enable management interventions to limit the detrimental effects of environmental decay. While the listing generates a static entity, the values that underlie the heritage assessment that led to the listing are mutable qualities, as are the cultural, social, and economic conditions in which the heritage is embedded. Given the mutability, often due to intergenerational change, there is a need to review the heritage lists so that they remain fit for purpose. This paper outlines a methodology to assess the universe of heritage assets in a heritage register to arrive at a resilient and, in particular, defensible heritage management regime. A case study, conducted in Albury, NSW (Australia), exemplifies the methodological approach.

Urban ScienceVol. 10(2)
Charles Sturt University (AU)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
38.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.