Comparative Analysis of Machining Preparation Time of a Taper Tap: Traditional vs. Modern Approaches

This paper presents a comparative analysis of time parameters involved in the preparation phase of machining processes of the taper tap, contrasting traditional and modern approaches. The study examines the time required for the creation of a technological process sheet using traditional methods, and the time necessary for 3D modeling and CNC machine programming using modern CAD/CAM software Fusion 360 software (version v2.0.21286). Both approaches are based on the same workshop drawing so initial input data is consistent. The modern approach utilizes the Fusion 360 software (version v2.0.21286) for the creation of a 3D model and CNC machine programming. The traditional method relies on manual interpretation of the workshop drawing and handwritten technological process sheet that contains information about machining operations. Time consumption for each phase (technological planning in the traditional method and digital modeling and programming in the modern method) is measured and compared. The study aims to determine which approach demonstrates higher practical efficiency in specific production contexts and conditions. The scientific contribution of this work lies in providing quantifiable insights into the differences between traditional and modern production preparation methods, thereby supporting decision-making processes in the selection of optimal machining preparation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026125016
Primary Topic
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Machining Preparation Time of a Taper Tap: Traditional vs. Modern Approaches

Eleonora Desnica, Ivan Palinkaš, Dejan Bajić, Luka Đorđević et al.
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
article

Comparative Analysis of Machining Preparation Time of a Taper Tap: Traditional vs. Modern Approaches

Eleonora Desnica, Ivan Palinkaš, Dejan Bajić, Luka Đorđević, Mića Đurđev
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of time parameters involved in the preparation phase of machining processes of the taper tap, contrasting traditional and modern approaches. The study examines the time required for the creation of a technological process sheet using traditional methods, and the time necessary for 3D modeling and CNC machine programming using modern CAD/CAM software Fusion 360 software (version v2.0.21286). Both approaches are based on the same workshop drawing so initial input data is consistent. The modern approach utilizes the Fusion 360 software (version v2.0.21286) for the creation of a 3D model and CNC machine programming. The traditional method relies on manual interpretation of the workshop drawing and handwritten technological process sheet that contains information about machining operations. Time consumption for each phase (technological planning in the traditional method and digital modeling and programming in the modern method) is measured and compared. The study aims to determine which approach demonstrates higher practical efficiency in specific production contexts and conditions. The scientific contribution of this work lies in providing quantifiable insights into the differences between traditional and modern production preparation methods, thereby supporting decision-making processes in the selection of optimal machining preparation strategies.

University of Novi Sad (RS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.