To be(t) or not to be(t): A Bayesian approach to statistical data analysis

The process of learning from observation is the founding step of Science. When it goes in the direction of collecting empyrical observations and getting to general rules it is called “induction”, and it has the goal to infer from the effects of a given phenomenon its causes. The opposite process, consisting in going from the causes to the effects, is called “deduction”. Both of these approaches suffer the fact that any observation has an associated uncertainty due to the finite resolution of any measurement. This leads to the question, fundamental for a quantitative analysis of the universe, of what is the real value of a measured quantity, if the measurement is affected by a given experimental uncertainty. Statistics aims at disciplining the process of answering to the latter question. However, in classical statistics the information one gets is the probability of the effects assuming a given cause, e.g. the probability of observing a given data set if a specific value for a parameter is assumed (useful when comparing, for example, parameters estimated through different models). On the maximization of the latter is based, e.g., the Likelihood method. The goal is, though, to have a more general probability, where also the probability of the causes is taken into account. This leads to the Bayes theorem and to the Bayesian statistics, which provides a framework based on the concept of prior believes and on the definition of conditional probability, that is the probability that an event will occur under the hypothesis that another event has occurred. In this approach, the roles played by the different elements entering into the definition of probability - priors, posteriors, Likelihood - are properly organized so to identify the role of the previous knowledge about a given phenomenon, how it gets updated by any new measurement and how the process can be done recursively so to exploit any new the information on the relevant quantities inspected in a given measurements.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-07-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202533101005/pdf
Primary Topic
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To be(t) or not to be(t): A Bayesian approach to statistical data analysis

Silvia Pisano
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
article

To be(t) or not to be(t): A Bayesian approach to statistical data analysis

Silvia Pisano
article en

Abstract

The process of learning from observation is the founding step of Science. When it goes in the direction of collecting empyrical observations and getting to general rules it is called “induction”, and it has the goal to infer from the effects of a given phenomenon its causes. The opposite process, consisting in going from the causes to the effects, is called “deduction”. Both of these approaches suffer the fact that any observation has an associated uncertainty due to the finite resolution of any measurement. This leads to the question, fundamental for a quantitative analysis of the universe, of what is the real value of a measured quantity, if the measurement is affected by a given experimental uncertainty. Statistics aims at disciplining the process of answering to the latter question. However, in classical statistics the information one gets is the probability of the effects assuming a given cause, e.g. the probability of observing a given data set if a specific value for a parameter is assumed (useful when comparing, for example, parameters estimated through different models). On the maximization of the latter is based, e.g., the Likelihood method. The goal is, though, to have a more general probability, where also the probability of the causes is taken into account. This leads to the Bayes theorem and to the Bayesian statistics, which provides a framework based on the concept of prior believes and on the definition of conditional probability, that is the probability that an event will occur under the hypothesis that another event has occurred. In this approach, the roles played by the different elements entering into the definition of probability - priors, posteriors, Likelihood - are properly organized so to identify the role of the previous knowledge about a given phenomenon, how it gets updated by any new measurement and how the process can be done recursively so to exploit any new the information on the relevant quantities inspected in a given measurements.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

To be(t) or not to be(t): A Bayesian approach to statistical data analysis — Silvia Pisano · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS