Artificial intelligence in science education: global insights and future directions

relationships in learning, seeing AI as a co-participant that co-designs assessments for measuring students' usable knowledge in science education (Li et al., 2025).The global shift in science education toward helping learners use knowledge rather than merely recall it (Pellegrino & Hilton, 2012) makes the exploration of AI's role particularly timely.In the past decade, scholars have leveraged machine learning to automatically score student artifacts (e.g., Liu et al., 2016;Zhai et al., 2022), generate formative feedback for teachers (e.g., He et al., 2024b), and support students' model-based reasoning and explanation construction (e.g., He et al., 2024a;Zhu et al., 2020).These developments align closely with the core vision of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS, NGSS Lead States, 2013) and similar frameworks worldwide (e.g., Chinese Ministry of Education, 2017; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2023), which emphasize the integration of disciplinary and interdisciplinary core ideas and scientific and engineering practices.However, the rapid acceleration of generative AI, especially systems such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude, has dramatically expanded both the possibilities and uncertainties surrounding AI's use in STEM Education.Across contexts, teachers and researchers are grappling with several fundamental questions: How can AI be used to promote usable knowledge?In what ways can teachers leverage AI to interpret student thinking and provide timely, actionable, and constructive feedback?How do we ensure that AI-enhanced learning environments remain equitable, transparent, and aligned with human values?And perhaps most importantly, how do we prepare the next generation of teachers and students to engage with AI critically and responsibly?These questions demand not only technical innovation but also

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-026-00154-2
Primary Topic
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence in science education: global insights and future directions

Peng He, Joseph Krajcik
Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
article

Artificial intelligence in science education: global insights and future directions

Peng He, Joseph Krajcik
article en

Abstract

relationships in learning, seeing AI as a co-participant that co-designs assessments for measuring students' usable knowledge in science education (Li et al., 2025).The global shift in science education toward helping learners use knowledge rather than merely recall it (Pellegrino & Hilton, 2012) makes the exploration of AI's role particularly timely.In the past decade, scholars have leveraged machine learning to automatically score student artifacts (e.g., Liu et al., 2016;Zhai et al., 2022), generate formative feedback for teachers (e.g., He et al., 2024b), and support students' model-based reasoning and explanation construction (e.g., He et al., 2024a;Zhu et al., 2020).These developments align closely with the core vision of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS, NGSS Lead States, 2013) and similar frameworks worldwide (e.g., Chinese Ministry of Education, 2017; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2023), which emphasize the integration of disciplinary and interdisciplinary core ideas and scientific and engineering practices.However, the rapid acceleration of generative AI, especially systems such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude, has dramatically expanded both the possibilities and uncertainties surrounding AI's use in STEM Education.Across contexts, teachers and researchers are grappling with several fundamental questions: How can AI be used to promote usable knowledge?In what ways can teachers leverage AI to interpret student thinking and provide timely, actionable, and constructive feedback?How do we ensure that AI-enhanced learning environments remain equitable, transparent, and aligned with human values?And perhaps most importantly, how do we prepare the next generation of teachers and students to engage with AI critically and responsibly?These questions demand not only technical innovation but also

Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education ResearchVol. 8(1)
Washington State University (US), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.