Chromosomal microarray analysis for the prenatal diagnosis in fetuses with fetal echogenic bowel: a retrospective cohort study

Fetal echogenic bowel (FEB) is often accompanied by the presence of chromosomal abnormalities. Here, we intend to evaluate the efficiency of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for identifying fetal risks associated with FEB, with a focus on chromosomal abnormalities and adverse pregnancy outcomes linked to FEB. This retrospective study included a total of 446 pregnant women who underwent CMA and had intrauterine fetuses with FEB. This cohort was classified into multiple subgroups for analysis, so as to obtain the relationships among FEB in different groups, chromosome microarray results, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. For fetuses with non-isolated FEB, the pathogenicity rate and microarray abnormality rate were higher than those with isolated FEB. Surprisingly, this study found that the detection rate of pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs) in FEB during the second trimester was higher than that in the third trimester. Conversely, the detection rate of FEB with variants of uncertain significance (VOUS) in the third trimester was higher than that in the second trimester. The pathogenic CNVs in cases with combined ultrasound soft markers was higher than those without, and the more soft markers were combined, the higher the abnormal rate and pathogenic rate. The detection rate of FEB with VOUS in pregnant women with a history of adverse pregnancy outcomes was higher than those without such a history. The correlations between soft markers and FEB or gestational age (GA) at diagnosis and FEB were risk factors for abnormal CMA results in FEB cases. The correlation between GA at diagnosis and FEB was a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes in FEB cases. Both the GA at diagnosis and soft markers are important factors for predicting CMA abnormalities. The correlation between the GA at diagnosis and FEB is also a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes of FEB.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-026-08655-8
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chromosomal microarray analysis for the prenatal diagnosis in fetuses with fetal echogenic bowel: a retrospective cohort study

Miao Liu, Dongmei Man, Wenli Wu, Fengge Wang et al.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Chromosomal microarray analysis for the prenatal diagnosis in fetuses with fetal echogenic bowel: a retrospective cohort study

Miao Liu, Dongmei Man, Wenli Wu, Fengge Wang, Meng Tian
article en

Abstract

Fetal echogenic bowel (FEB) is often accompanied by the presence of chromosomal abnormalities. Here, we intend to evaluate the efficiency of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for identifying fetal risks associated with FEB, with a focus on chromosomal abnormalities and adverse pregnancy outcomes linked to FEB. This retrospective study included a total of 446 pregnant women who underwent CMA and had intrauterine fetuses with FEB. This cohort was classified into multiple subgroups for analysis, so as to obtain the relationships among FEB in different groups, chromosome microarray results, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. For fetuses with non-isolated FEB, the pathogenicity rate and microarray abnormality rate were higher than those with isolated FEB. Surprisingly, this study found that the detection rate of pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs) in FEB during the second trimester was higher than that in the third trimester. Conversely, the detection rate of FEB with variants of uncertain significance (VOUS) in the third trimester was higher than that in the second trimester. The pathogenic CNVs in cases with combined ultrasound soft markers was higher than those without, and the more soft markers were combined, the higher the abnormal rate and pathogenic rate. The detection rate of FEB with VOUS in pregnant women with a history of adverse pregnancy outcomes was higher than those without such a history. The correlations between soft markers and FEB or gestational age (GA) at diagnosis and FEB were risk factors for abnormal CMA results in FEB cases. The correlation between GA at diagnosis and FEB was a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes in FEB cases. Both the GA at diagnosis and soft markers are important factors for predicting CMA abnormalities. The correlation between the GA at diagnosis and FEB is also a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes of FEB.

BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthVol. 26(1)
Northeast Normal University (CN), Jilin University (CN), Ministry of Education (KN), Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University (CN), Jining Medical University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.