Reimagining MAiD for psychiatric illness: Ethical dilemmas among Veterans, clinical realities, and the road ahead

Introduction: The expansion of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) in Canada to include, as of Mar. 17, 2027, mental illness as a sole underlying medical condition (MI-SUMC) raises significant clinical, legal, and ethical concerns, particularly for Veterans, who are disproportionately affected by difficult-to-treat psychiatric conditions. Structural vulnerabilities, including poverty, discrimination, gender-based disparities, and poor access to care, compound psychiatric suffering and increase the risk of premature death among marginalized groups. Methods: The authors conducted a comprehensive review of clinical, legal, and ethical literature, including expert reports, case law, and systematic reviews. Key areas of analysis include terminology regarding difficult-to-treat conditions, limitations of current capacity assessments, structural vulnerability, and ethical tensions between suicide prevention and MAiD for MI-SUMC. Results: There is no consistent definition of difficult-to-treat conditions, with over 150 existing for major depressive disorder alone. Prognoses remain highly variable, weakening claims of irremediability. Current capacity assessments often overlook trauma, emotional states, and systemic barriers, introducing bias. Suicidality, a common symptom of psychiatric illness, complicates distinctions between autonomous MAiD requests and crisis responses. Last, evidence from jurisdictions like Belgium and the Netherlands demonstrates that structurally marginalized individuals are over-represented in psychiatric MAiD, raising concerns of systemic coercion. Discussion: Given the unresolved uncertainties around irremediability, suicidality, and access to care, a precautionary approach is warranted. Without equitable access to advanced, neuroscientifically informed treatments, some may request MAiD because of lack of alternatives. Safeguards such as longitudinal monitoring, inter-blinded assessments, and expanded access to care are essential to protect vulnerable groups, especially Veterans.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Military Veteran and Family Health
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/jmvfh-2025-0034
Primary Topic
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reimagining MAiD for psychiatric illness: Ethical dilemmas among Veterans, clinical realities, and the road ahead

Gabrielle Dupuis, Stéphanie A.H. Bélanger, Rakesh Jetly, Andrew A. Nicholson et al.
Journal of Military Veteran and Family Health
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
article

Reimagining MAiD for psychiatric illness: Ethical dilemmas among Veterans, clinical realities, and the road ahead

Gabrielle Dupuis, Stéphanie A.H. Bélanger, Rakesh Jetly, Andrew A. Nicholson, Jitender Sareen
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The expansion of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) in Canada to include, as of Mar. 17, 2027, mental illness as a sole underlying medical condition (MI-SUMC) raises significant clinical, legal, and ethical concerns, particularly for Veterans, who are disproportionately affected by difficult-to-treat psychiatric conditions. Structural vulnerabilities, including poverty, discrimination, gender-based disparities, and poor access to care, compound psychiatric suffering and increase the risk of premature death among marginalized groups. Methods: The authors conducted a comprehensive review of clinical, legal, and ethical literature, including expert reports, case law, and systematic reviews. Key areas of analysis include terminology regarding difficult-to-treat conditions, limitations of current capacity assessments, structural vulnerability, and ethical tensions between suicide prevention and MAiD for MI-SUMC. Results: There is no consistent definition of difficult-to-treat conditions, with over 150 existing for major depressive disorder alone. Prognoses remain highly variable, weakening claims of irremediability. Current capacity assessments often overlook trauma, emotional states, and systemic barriers, introducing bias. Suicidality, a common symptom of psychiatric illness, complicates distinctions between autonomous MAiD requests and crisis responses. Last, evidence from jurisdictions like Belgium and the Netherlands demonstrates that structurally marginalized individuals are over-represented in psychiatric MAiD, raising concerns of systemic coercion. Discussion: Given the unresolved uncertainties around irremediability, suicidality, and access to care, a precautionary approach is warranted. Without equitable access to advanced, neuroscientifically informed treatments, some may request MAiD because of lack of alternatives. Safeguards such as longitudinal monitoring, inter-blinded assessments, and expanded access to care are essential to protect vulnerable groups, especially Veterans.

Journal of Military Veteran and Family HealthVol. 12(1)
Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre (CA), Canadian Institute for Military and Veteran Health Research (CA), University of Manitoba (CA), Carleton University (CA)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.