Environmental impacts of different types of floor slabs

The implementation of a more sustainable construction sector is a reality today. To this end, understanding how concrete and steel structures and their respective structural elements, such as slabs, columns, beams, walls, etc., impact the environment is an effective strategy for generating sustainability. This research aims to determine the environmental impact of the six most common types of floor slabs in buildings. These types of floor slabs are: solid slabs, in-situ joist slabs, precast concrete joist slabs, metal joist slabs and, finally, both permanent and removable waffle slabs. To address this research, an office building has been modelled in CYPECAD, where one of the floors has been subjected to study. To determine the environmental impacts, the methodology par excellence, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), was used. The system boundaries selected for the LCA correspond to a cradle-to-gate scope for the building, and the results obtained covered eight impact categories. Among the main results per unit area (m2) of floor slab and for the Global Warming Potential impact category (kg CO2 eq), it turns out that the concrete slab type yields a value of 93,01 kg CO2 eq/m2, which represents an increase in emissions of up to 51,68% compared to the in situ concrete joist slab type (44,94 kg CO2 eq/m2) and even an increase of 53,27% compared to the metal joist slab type (43,46 kg CO2 eq). This research has yielded results that can be easily extrapolated to other buildings to determine their environmental impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anales de Edificación
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20868/ade.2025.5639
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental impacts of different types of floor slabs

Javier Cabello, Esteban Fraile-García, Fátima Somovilla-Gómez, Jorge Los-Santos-Ortega
Anales de Edificación
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Environmental impacts of different types of floor slabs

Javier Cabello, Esteban Fraile-García, Fátima Somovilla-Gómez, Jorge Los-Santos-Ortega
article en

Abstract

The implementation of a more sustainable construction sector is a reality today. To this end, understanding how concrete and steel structures and their respective structural elements, such as slabs, columns, beams, walls, etc., impact the environment is an effective strategy for generating sustainability. This research aims to determine the environmental impact of the six most common types of floor slabs in buildings. These types of floor slabs are: solid slabs, in-situ joist slabs, precast concrete joist slabs, metal joist slabs and, finally, both permanent and removable waffle slabs. To address this research, an office building has been modelled in CYPECAD, where one of the floors has been subjected to study. To determine the environmental impacts, the methodology par excellence, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), was used. The system boundaries selected for the LCA correspond to a cradle-to-gate scope for the building, and the results obtained covered eight impact categories. Among the main results per unit area (m2) of floor slab and for the Global Warming Potential impact category (kg CO2 eq), it turns out that the concrete slab type yields a value of 93,01 kg CO2 eq/m2, which represents an increase in emissions of up to 51,68% compared to the in situ concrete joist slab type (44,94 kg CO2 eq/m2) and even an increase of 53,27% compared to the metal joist slab type (43,46 kg CO2 eq). This research has yielded results that can be easily extrapolated to other buildings to determine their environmental impact.

Anales de EdificaciónVol. 11(3)
Universidad de La Rioja (ES), National University of La Rioja (AR)
Universidad de La Rioja
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.