Evaluating RayCloudTools to estimate single-tree volume

Abstract Above-Ground Forest Biomass (AGB) is vital for understanding the carbon cycle, for carbon accounting, and for climate projections. Single-tree AGB measurements or precise estimates are crucial for calibrating and validating remote sensing based AGB mapping (e.g. in the area-based approaches), but remain costly and challenging to acquire. The recently introduced open-source RayCloudTools (RCT) software includes an efficient QSM (Quantitative Structure Model) solution, RCT-QSM that uses Dijkstra’s algorithm to segment and volumetrically reconstruct trees, providing tree volume, which further requires density to obtain mass. The accuracy and practicability of RCT-QSM, however, have remained largely unassessed. This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of RCT-QSM, by comparing its volume estimates against: (i) three publicly available datasets of temporally coinciding TLS (Terrestrial Laser Scanning) scans and destructive measurements, (ii) four existing QSM methods (AdTree, TreeQSM, AdQSM, and SimpleForest), and (iii) allometric model outputs from two experimental plots in Austria, where point clouds were obtained with terrestrial and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based laser scanning. The comparison with destructively acquired single-tree data (n = 124) from three publicly available datasets shows an overall high correspondence between RCT-QSM derived volumes and destructively harvested volumes (CCC = 0.95) with a moderate negative bias (−7.3%) and an NRMSE of 5%. RCT-QSM outperforms other existing QSM solutions, such as AdTree, AdQSM, SimpleForest, and TreeQSM. TreeQSM metrics, however, show only small differences compared to RCT-QSM. An extensive point density sensitivity analysis featuring 1860 systematically downsampled point clouds from the same dataset demonstrates RCT-QSM’s high robustness to variations in point density. Accuracy and completeness of the results remain stable for point densities as low as one point per 10x10x10 cm voxel. Regarding the large-scale applicability, RCT-QSM provides reliable results for two experimental plots in Austria, which were scanned with TLS and UAV-LS, respectively. RCT-QSM efficiently derives single-tree volume, aligning well with allometric models, demonstrating its applicability across various data acquisition settings and forest conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpaf087
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating RayCloudTools to estimate single-tree volume

Moonis Ali, Florian Pöppl, Florian Hofhansl, Milutin Milenković et al.
Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
article

Evaluating RayCloudTools to estimate single-tree volume

Moonis Ali, Florian Pöppl, Florian Hofhansl, Milutin Milenković, Benjamin Wild, Taşkın Özkan, Alvaro Lau, Markus Hollaus, Norbert Pfeifer
article en

Abstract

Abstract Above-Ground Forest Biomass (AGB) is vital for understanding the carbon cycle, for carbon accounting, and for climate projections. Single-tree AGB measurements or precise estimates are crucial for calibrating and validating remote sensing based AGB mapping (e.g. in the area-based approaches), but remain costly and challenging to acquire. The recently introduced open-source RayCloudTools (RCT) software includes an efficient QSM (Quantitative Structure Model) solution, RCT-QSM that uses Dijkstra’s algorithm to segment and volumetrically reconstruct trees, providing tree volume, which further requires density to obtain mass. The accuracy and practicability of RCT-QSM, however, have remained largely unassessed. This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of RCT-QSM, by comparing its volume estimates against: (i) three publicly available datasets of temporally coinciding TLS (Terrestrial Laser Scanning) scans and destructive measurements, (ii) four existing QSM methods (AdTree, TreeQSM, AdQSM, and SimpleForest), and (iii) allometric model outputs from two experimental plots in Austria, where point clouds were obtained with terrestrial and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based laser scanning. The comparison with destructively acquired single-tree data (n = 124) from three publicly available datasets shows an overall high correspondence between RCT-QSM derived volumes and destructively harvested volumes (CCC = 0.95) with a moderate negative bias (−7.3%) and an NRMSE of 5%. RCT-QSM outperforms other existing QSM solutions, such as AdTree, AdQSM, SimpleForest, and TreeQSM. TreeQSM metrics, however, show only small differences compared to RCT-QSM. An extensive point density sensitivity analysis featuring 1860 systematically downsampled point clouds from the same dataset demonstrates RCT-QSM’s high robustness to variations in point density. Accuracy and completeness of the results remain stable for point densities as low as one point per 10x10x10 cm voxel. Regarding the large-scale applicability, RCT-QSM provides reliable results for two experimental plots in Austria, which were scanned with TLS and UAV-LS, respectively. RCT-QSM efficiently derives single-tree volume, aligning well with allometric models, demonstrating its applicability across various data acquisition settings and forest conditions.

Forestry An International Journal of Forest ResearchVol. 99(1)
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT), GeoInformation (United Kingdom) (GB), Wageningen University & Research (NL), Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IN)
Technische Universität Wien, Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft, Technische Universität Wien Bibliothek
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.