Outpatient Cutaneous Wound Care in the United States: Specialty Distribution and Antimicrobial Prescribing Patterns

<b>Background:</b> Cutaneous wounds are common in outpatient care, but national patterns of who manages them and how antimicrobials are used remain unclear. <b>Objectives</b>: To characterize outpatient specialty involvement and antimicrobial use for acute and chronic cutaneous wound visits in the United States. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 2011-2019 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) data. Cutaneous wound visits were identified using prespecified ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes and classified as acute (open or traumatic wounds and burns) or chronic (pressure injuries and lower-limb ulcers). Survey weights were applied to estimate national visit volumes, specialty shares, and antimicrobial utilization patterns. <b>Results</b>: We identified 45.1 million cutaneous wound visits, representing 0.8% of all outpatient visits, of which about two thirds were acute and one third chronic. Primary care physicians accounted for the largest share of wound visits, while dermatologists managed 3.9% of overall wound visits, 2.4% of acute visits, and 7.4% of chronic visits. Among 156.6 million medications recorded at wound visits, antimicrobials represented 13.1% overall, 14.9% in acute visits, and 10.2% in chronic visits. Cephalexin accounted for 32.1% of antimicrobial medications overall and 39.2% in acute visits, whereas chronic wound visits had a more heterogeneous antimicrobial profile that included topical mupirocin, cephalexin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and topical nystatin. <b>Conclusions</b>: Outpatient cutaneous wound care in the United States is delivered predominantly by primary care clinicians and relies heavily on a small set of systemic and topical antimicrobials, highlighting opportunities to strengthen antimicrobial stewardship and expand dermatology's role in chronic wound management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antibiotics
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics15020142
Primary Topic
Wound Healing and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outpatient Cutaneous Wound Care in the United States: Specialty Distribution and Antimicrobial Prescribing Patterns

Steven R. Feldman, Rithi J. Chandy, Jiwon Park
Antibiotics
Wound Healing and Treatments
article

Outpatient Cutaneous Wound Care in the United States: Specialty Distribution and Antimicrobial Prescribing Patterns

Steven R. Feldman, Rithi J. Chandy, Jiwon Park
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Cutaneous wounds are common in outpatient care, but national patterns of who manages them and how antimicrobials are used remain unclear. <b>Objectives</b>: To characterize outpatient specialty involvement and antimicrobial use for acute and chronic cutaneous wound visits in the United States. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 2011-2019 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) data. Cutaneous wound visits were identified using prespecified ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes and classified as acute (open or traumatic wounds and burns) or chronic (pressure injuries and lower-limb ulcers). Survey weights were applied to estimate national visit volumes, specialty shares, and antimicrobial utilization patterns. <b>Results</b>: We identified 45.1 million cutaneous wound visits, representing 0.8% of all outpatient visits, of which about two thirds were acute and one third chronic. Primary care physicians accounted for the largest share of wound visits, while dermatologists managed 3.9% of overall wound visits, 2.4% of acute visits, and 7.4% of chronic visits. Among 156.6 million medications recorded at wound visits, antimicrobials represented 13.1% overall, 14.9% in acute visits, and 10.2% in chronic visits. Cephalexin accounted for 32.1% of antimicrobial medications overall and 39.2% in acute visits, whereas chronic wound visits had a more heterogeneous antimicrobial profile that included topical mupirocin, cephalexin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and topical nystatin. <b>Conclusions</b>: Outpatient cutaneous wound care in the United States is delivered predominantly by primary care clinicians and relies heavily on a small set of systemic and topical antimicrobials, highlighting opportunities to strengthen antimicrobial stewardship and expand dermatology's role in chronic wound management.

AntibioticsVol. 15(2)
University School (US), Wake Forest University (US), Case Western Reserve University (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Wound Healing and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.