A Prospective Case–Control Study of Efficacy and Safety of a Combination of Dinoprostone Gel and Intracervical Foley\'s Catheter vs Dinoprostone Gel Alone for Cervical Ripening

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of a combination of an intracervical Foley's catheter with dinoprostone gel vs dinoprostone gel alone for cervical ripening.Study design: Eighty term pregnant women with an indication for induction of labor and an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score 6) were enrolled and assigned into two groups of 40 each. Group A: Received an intracervical Foley's catheter along with 0.5 mg dinoprostone gel placed in the posterior fornix, repeated every 6 hours for a maximum of three doses. Group B: Received 0.5 mg of dinoprostone gel alone, placed in the posterior fornix at the same interval and dose schedule.Both groups were compared for efficacy and safety outcomes.Results: Baseline characteristics, including mean age, parity, and precervical ripening Bishop's score, were similar between both the groups.The mean precervical ripening Bishop score was 2.68 0.62 in group A and 2.98 0.89 in group B. After cervical ripening, the mean Bishop score increased to 5.58 1.04 in group A and 4.94 1.12 in group B, showing a significantly greater improvement in group A (p = 0.0098).A significantly higher proportion of women in group A achieved favorable cervical ripening, had a greater rate of vaginal deliveries (p = 0.044), and experienced shorter cervical ripening interval (p-value = 0.035) and induction-to-delivery interval (p = 0.021) as compared to group B. Complications such as fetal distress, chorioamnionitis, and uterine tachysystole were more frequent in group B. Conclusion:The combination of an intracervical Foley catheter with dinoprostone gel proved to be a more effective and safer method for cervical ripening than dinoprostone gel alone.This combined approach resulted in faster cervical ripening, shorter induction-to-delivery intervals, and fewer complications, suggesting a synergistic benefit of mechanical and pharmacologic methods.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10006-2834
Primary Topic
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Prospective Case–Control Study of Efficacy and Safety of a Combination of Dinoprostone Gel and Intracervical Foley\'s Catheter vs Dinoprostone Gel Alone for Cervical Ripening

Ruchika Garg, Neelansha Varshney, Manjulata Verma, Amita Pandey et al.
Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
article

A Prospective Case–Control Study of Efficacy and Safety of a Combination of Dinoprostone Gel and Intracervical Foley\'s Catheter vs Dinoprostone Gel Alone for Cervical Ripening

Ruchika Garg, Neelansha Varshney, Manjulata Verma, Amita Pandey, Uma Singh
article en

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of a combination of an intracervical Foley's catheter with dinoprostone gel vs dinoprostone gel alone for cervical ripening.Study design: Eighty term pregnant women with an indication for induction of labor and an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score 6) were enrolled and assigned into two groups of 40 each. Group A: Received an intracervical Foley's catheter along with 0.5 mg dinoprostone gel placed in the posterior fornix, repeated every 6 hours for a maximum of three doses. Group B: Received 0.5 mg of dinoprostone gel alone, placed in the posterior fornix at the same interval and dose schedule.Both groups were compared for efficacy and safety outcomes.Results: Baseline characteristics, including mean age, parity, and precervical ripening Bishop's score, were similar between both the groups.The mean precervical ripening Bishop score was 2.68 0.62 in group A and 2.98 0.89 in group B. After cervical ripening, the mean Bishop score increased to 5.58 1.04 in group A and 4.94 1.12 in group B, showing a significantly greater improvement in group A (p = 0.0098).A significantly higher proportion of women in group A achieved favorable cervical ripening, had a greater rate of vaginal deliveries (p = 0.044), and experienced shorter cervical ripening interval (p-value = 0.035) and induction-to-delivery interval (p = 0.021) as compared to group B. Complications such as fetal distress, chorioamnionitis, and uterine tachysystole were more frequent in group B. Conclusion:The combination of an intracervical Foley catheter with dinoprostone gel proved to be a more effective and safer method for cervical ripening than dinoprostone gel alone.This combined approach resulted in faster cervical ripening, shorter induction-to-delivery intervals, and fewer complications, suggesting a synergistic benefit of mechanical and pharmacologic methods.

Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and GynaecologyVol. 17(S3)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Prospective Case–Control Study of Efficacy and Safety of a Combination of Dinoprostone Gel and Intracervical Foley\'s Catheter vs Dinoprostone Gel Alone for Cervical Ripening — Ruchika Garg, Neelansha Varshney, et al. · Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS