Nutrient availability modulates impacts of short‐term shifts in temperature and grazing on phytoplankton composition and size structure

Abstract The significant contribution of phytoplankton to global primary production is regulated by several abiotic and biotic factors, which are often difficult to account for in natural systems. To address these challenges, we perturbed a summer plankton community from Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, USA, by manipulating the temperature and nutrient conditions in a controlled short‐term incubation experiment and tracked changes in phytoplankton community structure in response to fluctuations in phytoplankton physiology and microzooplankton grazing. Water was incubated at the in situ temperature (22°C) and at deviations from that temperature (± 4°C) with both macronutrient amendments (N, P, and Si addition) and unamended controls. We found nutrient availability and microzooplankton grazing to have pronounced and opposite impacts on phytoplankton size composition, with nutrient amendments shifting the phytoplankton community toward larger cells and grazing rates correlated with smaller phytoplankton communities and low‐nutrient conditions. Nutrient amendments also altered cellular elemental ratios by increasing chlorophyll : C. Conversely, temperature was not found to have a direct impact on size or elemental stoichiometry, but did influence community composition. These findings paralleled prior observations from lab and field studies in Narragansett Bay which together suggest that over shorter timescales, nutrient availability may have a greater impact on phytoplankton community composition than temperature or grazing, altering phytoplankton nutritional value for higher trophic levels and as a result, secondary production. Thus, understanding underlying nutrient dynamics will be necessary to decipher how short‐term changes in temperature or grazing may impact phytoplankton communities and the ecosystems they support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Limnology and Oceanography
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.70322
Primary Topic
Marine and coastal ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nutrient availability modulates impacts of short‐term shifts in temperature and grazing on phytoplankton composition and size structure

Elena Litchman, Joshua D. Kling, Stephanie I. Anderson, Colin T. Kremer et al.
Limnology and Oceanography
Marine and coastal ecosystems
article

Nutrient availability modulates impacts of short‐term shifts in temperature and grazing on phytoplankton composition and size structure

Elena Litchman, Joshua D. Kling, Stephanie I. Anderson, Colin T. Kremer, Paul Wilburn, Gayantonia Franzé, Susanne Menden‐Deuer, David A. Hutchins, Tatiana A. Rynearson
article en

Abstract

Abstract The significant contribution of phytoplankton to global primary production is regulated by several abiotic and biotic factors, which are often difficult to account for in natural systems. To address these challenges, we perturbed a summer plankton community from Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, USA, by manipulating the temperature and nutrient conditions in a controlled short‐term incubation experiment and tracked changes in phytoplankton community structure in response to fluctuations in phytoplankton physiology and microzooplankton grazing. Water was incubated at the in situ temperature (22°C) and at deviations from that temperature (± 4°C) with both macronutrient amendments (N, P, and Si addition) and unamended controls. We found nutrient availability and microzooplankton grazing to have pronounced and opposite impacts on phytoplankton size composition, with nutrient amendments shifting the phytoplankton community toward larger cells and grazing rates correlated with smaller phytoplankton communities and low‐nutrient conditions. Nutrient amendments also altered cellular elemental ratios by increasing chlorophyll : C. Conversely, temperature was not found to have a direct impact on size or elemental stoichiometry, but did influence community composition. These findings paralleled prior observations from lab and field studies in Narragansett Bay which together suggest that over shorter timescales, nutrient availability may have a greater impact on phytoplankton community composition than temperature or grazing, altering phytoplankton nutritional value for higher trophic levels and as a result, secondary production. Thus, understanding underlying nutrient dynamics will be necessary to decipher how short‐term changes in temperature or grazing may impact phytoplankton communities and the ecosystems they support.

Limnology and OceanographyVol. 71(2)
University of Southern California (US), University of Connecticut (US), University of Rhode Island (US), Michigan State University (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Marine and coastal ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.