The Upright Position of the Human Body: An Innocent Metaphorical Tool or a Yardstick of Dignity?

Abstract This article explores how upright posture functions as a cultural norm deeply embedded in language, values, and institutions. Drawing on George Lakoff and Mark Johnson’s conceptual metaphor theory, we show how verticality schemas shape thought and discourse by associating “up” with dignity, autonomy, and competence, while “down” signals weakness and inferiority. These metaphorical structures influence on institutions like architecture, rehabilitation practices, and social security systems, privileging standing bodies and marginalizing wheelchair users. To examine the lived impact of this norm, we analyze qualitative interview data from fifteen Finnish wheelchair users. Their experiences reveal how being below eye level signifies inequality and how rehabilitation often enforces uprightness. The wheelchair emerges as a cultural symbol of deviation, reinforcing ableist hierarchies. This article argues that human dignity should not depend on upright posture. We call for action that respects bodily diversity and challenges the cultural privilege of standing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-026-10433-w
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Upright Position of the Human Body: An Innocent Metaphorical Tool or a Yardstick of Dignity?

Karoliina Ahonen, Maija Aalto-Heinilä, Pauli Rautiainen
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique
Disability Rights and Representation
article

The Upright Position of the Human Body: An Innocent Metaphorical Tool or a Yardstick of Dignity?

Karoliina Ahonen, Maija Aalto-Heinilä, Pauli Rautiainen
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article explores how upright posture functions as a cultural norm deeply embedded in language, values, and institutions. Drawing on George Lakoff and Mark Johnson’s conceptual metaphor theory, we show how verticality schemas shape thought and discourse by associating “up” with dignity, autonomy, and competence, while “down” signals weakness and inferiority. These metaphorical structures influence on institutions like architecture, rehabilitation practices, and social security systems, privileging standing bodies and marginalizing wheelchair users. To examine the lived impact of this norm, we analyze qualitative interview data from fifteen Finnish wheelchair users. Their experiences reveal how being below eye level signifies inequality and how rehabilitation often enforces uprightness. The wheelchair emerges as a cultural symbol of deviation, reinforcing ableist hierarchies. This article argues that human dignity should not depend on upright posture. We call for action that respects bodily diversity and challenges the cultural privilege of standing.

International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique
University of Eastern Finland (FI)
Itä-Suomen Yliopisto, Kuopion Yliopistollinen Sairaala
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.