The Co-Development of Guiding Principles to Support Physical Activity Among the Least Active Children

Purpose: Physical inactivity in children remains a significant public health issue, with nearly 40% of United Kingdom children aged 8–10 not meeting recommended activity levels. While many interventions exist, a persistent gap remains – those children who remain inactive despite these efforts. This study aimed to co-develop a set of evidence-informed design principles specifically for interventions targeting the least active 8–10-year-olds. By using a stakeholder-led process, the goal was to generate practical, context-sensitive strategies that can be applied in both school and community settings. Methods: This qualitative research followed the Double Diamond Design Approach (DDDA) through a structured co-development workshop using participatory methods. Stakeholders (n = 29), including researchers (n = 12), public health professionals (n = 7), and community practitioners (n = 10), were recruited to ensure varied perspectives. Written and verbal data were collected through audio-recorded group discussions and workshops. Results: Preliminary insights included key themes relating to whole-family engagement, early years inclusion, and reframing physical activity as ‘movement’ to enhance accessibility and reduce stigma. Stakeholders prioritised culturally sensitive, inclusive designs and emphasised the importance of unstructured, fun-based play. Hyper-local delivery, safe environments, and adaptable programming were also highlighted as essential. Creative and multisport options, workforce diversity, and peer leadership also featured strongly. A modified Delphi process will be used for stakeholders to review and provide feedback on the draft principles. The final principles and statements will be presented at the HEPA conference. Conclusion: This study highlights the value of structured co-development in generating context-specific, practical strategies to increase physical activity among the least active children. By integrating stakeholder expertise with child- and parent-centred insights, the guiding principles developed are grounded in lived experience and designed for implementation in both school and community settings. The findings offer actionable, scalable solutions for educators, practitioners, and policymakers aiming to address persistent physical activity inequalities. Ongoing refinement further strengthens these principles, with future phases focused on real-world piloting to assess feasibility, sustainability, and long-term impact. ​Support/Funding Source: PhD funded through White Rose Doctoral Training Partnership.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Baltic Journal of Sport and Health Sciences
Published
2026-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33607/bjshs.v5isupplement.1917
Primary Topic
Children's Physical and Motor Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Co-Development of Guiding Principles to Support Physical Activity Among the Least Active Children

Shania Boom
Baltic Journal of Sport and Health Sciences
Children's Physical and Motor Development
article

The Co-Development of Guiding Principles to Support Physical Activity Among the Least Active Children

Shania Boom
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Physical inactivity in children remains a significant public health issue, with nearly 40% of United Kingdom children aged 8–10 not meeting recommended activity levels. While many interventions exist, a persistent gap remains – those children who remain inactive despite these efforts. This study aimed to co-develop a set of evidence-informed design principles specifically for interventions targeting the least active 8–10-year-olds. By using a stakeholder-led process, the goal was to generate practical, context-sensitive strategies that can be applied in both school and community settings. Methods: This qualitative research followed the Double Diamond Design Approach (DDDA) through a structured co-development workshop using participatory methods. Stakeholders (n = 29), including researchers (n = 12), public health professionals (n = 7), and community practitioners (n = 10), were recruited to ensure varied perspectives. Written and verbal data were collected through audio-recorded group discussions and workshops. Results: Preliminary insights included key themes relating to whole-family engagement, early years inclusion, and reframing physical activity as ‘movement’ to enhance accessibility and reduce stigma. Stakeholders prioritised culturally sensitive, inclusive designs and emphasised the importance of unstructured, fun-based play. Hyper-local delivery, safe environments, and adaptable programming were also highlighted as essential. Creative and multisport options, workforce diversity, and peer leadership also featured strongly. A modified Delphi process will be used for stakeholders to review and provide feedback on the draft principles. The final principles and statements will be presented at the HEPA conference. Conclusion: This study highlights the value of structured co-development in generating context-specific, practical strategies to increase physical activity among the least active children. By integrating stakeholder expertise with child- and parent-centred insights, the guiding principles developed are grounded in lived experience and designed for implementation in both school and community settings. The findings offer actionable, scalable solutions for educators, practitioners, and policymakers aiming to address persistent physical activity inequalities. Ongoing refinement further strengthens these principles, with future phases focused on real-world piloting to assess feasibility, sustainability, and long-term impact. ​Support/Funding Source: PhD funded through White Rose Doctoral Training Partnership.

Baltic Journal of Sport and Health SciencesVol. 5(Supplement)
University of Bradford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Children's Physical and Motor Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.