Perspective: Reconciling top-down with bottom-up institutional change: A co-evolutionary perspective for advancing the IB contribution to the SDGs

International business (IB) scholars and practitioners are increasingly concerned with grand societal challenges, many of which are represented by the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In this perspective paper, we advance a co-evolutionary perspective as an integrative approach to inform the intersection of IB and sustainable development, using the SDGs as the domain for our analysis. Our perspective acknowledges the complex interdependences of two key institutional mechanisms shaping SDG-related change: (1) top-down adjustments to formal rules driven by policymakers seeking to advance a shared global agenda, and (2) bottom-up grassroots evolution by diverse stakeholders who prioritize local relevance of SDG-related action. While IB research has a tendency to theorize based on either one, integrating both is important to surface and understand the roles that MNEs actually play in sustainable development. Our perspective offers directions for future IB research to advance understanding of the MNE’s role multiplexity in SDG-related contexts, to adopt systems perspectives that acknowledge feedback loops associated with institutional dynamics, and to assess the system-level impact of SDG-related change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of World Business
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2026.101722
Primary Topic
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspective: Reconciling top-down with bottom-up institutional change: A co-evolutionary perspective for advancing the IB contribution to the SDGs

Jonathan P. Doh, Thomas Lindner, Bjoern Schmeisser, Christof Miska
Journal of World Business
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
article

Perspective: Reconciling top-down with bottom-up institutional change: A co-evolutionary perspective for advancing the IB contribution to the SDGs

Jonathan P. Doh, Thomas Lindner, Bjoern Schmeisser, Christof Miska
article en

Abstract

International business (IB) scholars and practitioners are increasingly concerned with grand societal challenges, many of which are represented by the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In this perspective paper, we advance a co-evolutionary perspective as an integrative approach to inform the intersection of IB and sustainable development, using the SDGs as the domain for our analysis. Our perspective acknowledges the complex interdependences of two key institutional mechanisms shaping SDG-related change: (1) top-down adjustments to formal rules driven by policymakers seeking to advance a shared global agenda, and (2) bottom-up grassroots evolution by diverse stakeholders who prioritize local relevance of SDG-related action. While IB research has a tendency to theorize based on either one, integrating both is important to surface and understand the roles that MNEs actually play in sustainable development. Our perspective offers directions for future IB research to advance understanding of the MNE’s role multiplexity in SDG-related contexts, to adopt systems perspectives that acknowledge feedback loops associated with institutional dynamics, and to assess the system-level impact of SDG-related change.

Journal of World BusinessVol. 61(3)
Vienna University of Economics and Business (AT), Copenhagen Business School (DK), Universität Innsbruck (AT), Management Center Innsbruck (AT), Villanova University (US), International University (KH), Norwegian School of Economics (NO)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.