Are crop yields limited by pollinators? Proper assessments using pollinator gradients require measurements of flower density and yield potential

Abstract It is widely documented that many crops depend on animal—and primarily insect—pollination, but the degree to which pollinators limit yield in comparison with other factors is poorly understood. Recent studies conclude that pollinator visitation rates limit yields of many crops, based upon positive correlations between these two variables. However, these studies typically suffer from incomplete data on two key variables that affect both pollinator recruitment and yield: flower density per area and yield potential per flower, both driven by maternal resource availability. Here we review the literature on animal‐pollinated crops showing that (i) yields can be positively associated with flower density, and (ii) pollinator density can also be positively correlated with flower density; the third positive association observed between pollinator density and yield may result from the two first correlations, without causal relationship. Likewise, positive associations observed between (i) the amount of maternal resources per flower and yield potential per flower, and (ii) between the amount of maternal resources per flower and pollinator density per flower can both explain the positive correlation observed between yield per flower and pollinator density per flower. We conclude with an illustration reusing data from the literature to show that, without incorporating data on flower density and yield potential per flower, measuring yields and gradients of pollinator density per area alone can overestimate the degree to which pollinator visitation rates directly limit yield. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Functional Ecology
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.70269
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are crop yields limited by pollinators? Proper assessments using pollinator gradients require measurements of flower density and yield potential

James H. Cane, Bernard Vaissière, Rachel E. Mallinger, Stan Chabert
Functional Ecology
Plant and animal studies
article

Are crop yields limited by pollinators? Proper assessments using pollinator gradients require measurements of flower density and yield potential

James H. Cane, Bernard Vaissière, Rachel E. Mallinger, Stan Chabert
article en

Abstract

Abstract It is widely documented that many crops depend on animal—and primarily insect—pollination, but the degree to which pollinators limit yield in comparison with other factors is poorly understood. Recent studies conclude that pollinator visitation rates limit yields of many crops, based upon positive correlations between these two variables. However, these studies typically suffer from incomplete data on two key variables that affect both pollinator recruitment and yield: flower density per area and yield potential per flower, both driven by maternal resource availability. Here we review the literature on animal‐pollinated crops showing that (i) yields can be positively associated with flower density, and (ii) pollinator density can also be positively correlated with flower density; the third positive association observed between pollinator density and yield may result from the two first correlations, without causal relationship. Likewise, positive associations observed between (i) the amount of maternal resources per flower and yield potential per flower, and (ii) between the amount of maternal resources per flower and pollinator density per flower can both explain the positive correlation observed between yield per flower and pollinator density per flower. We conclude with an illustration reusing data from the literature to show that, without incorporating data on flower density and yield potential per flower, measuring yields and gradients of pollinator density per area alone can overestimate the degree to which pollinator visitation rates directly limit yield. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Functional EcologyVol. 40(3)
Utah State University (US), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Florida (US), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Département agronomie et sciences de l'environnement pour les agroécosystèmes (FR), Génétique Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage (FR)
European Commission, Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.