Experimental Afters: On Meaning Making with Collective Visual Fieldnotes

Abstract This essay explores the development of collective visual fieldnotes as an experimental ethnographic method that invites public participants to become research interlocutors within field site activities—as part of a broader effort to innovate ethnographic practice through the lens of art, science, and technology studies (ASTS). In developing this practice, the authors’ research team attends to the ways that ASTS reimagines how research encounters unfold and how knowledge is made. In a multiyear sensory ethnography focused on solid organ transplantation, members of the public were invited to visually reflect on their experiences during project events, “gifting” their visual notes to be included as part of the authors’ larger set of fieldnotes. These visual contributions were iteratively analyzed and later transformed into a transient sculpture modeled on the form of metal stabiles, enabling a new mode of reflection on transplantation’s affective terrain. From this process, four domains of key insights were drawn out: (1) rogue affects, (2) aesthetic surprises, (3) dialogical modes, and (4) cultural scripts. We conclude by reflecting on the role of ASTS sensibilities for understanding data analysis as a material, situated practice and on the qualities of emergent knowledge created through these processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Leonardo
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.a.2634
Primary Topic
Participatory Visual Research Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental Afters: On Meaning Making with Collective Visual Fieldnotes

Suze Berkhout, Kelly Fritsch, Trisha Banerjee, Megan Park
Leonardo
Participatory Visual Research Methods
article

Experimental Afters: On Meaning Making with Collective Visual Fieldnotes

Suze Berkhout, Kelly Fritsch, Trisha Banerjee, Megan Park
article en

Abstract

Abstract This essay explores the development of collective visual fieldnotes as an experimental ethnographic method that invites public participants to become research interlocutors within field site activities—as part of a broader effort to innovate ethnographic practice through the lens of art, science, and technology studies (ASTS). In developing this practice, the authors’ research team attends to the ways that ASTS reimagines how research encounters unfold and how knowledge is made. In a multiyear sensory ethnography focused on solid organ transplantation, members of the public were invited to visually reflect on their experiences during project events, “gifting” their visual notes to be included as part of the authors’ larger set of fieldnotes. These visual contributions were iteratively analyzed and later transformed into a transient sculpture modeled on the form of metal stabiles, enabling a new mode of reflection on transplantation’s affective terrain. From this process, four domains of key insights were drawn out: (1) rogue affects, (2) aesthetic surprises, (3) dialogical modes, and (4) cultural scripts. We conclude by reflecting on the role of ASTS sensibilities for understanding data analysis as a material, situated practice and on the qualities of emergent knowledge created through these processes.

Leonardo
University Health Network (CA), Canada Research Chairs (CA), Banco Santander (Spain) (ES), Carleton University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Participatory Visual Research Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.