Development of an evaluation indicator system for the quality of science and technology ethics review committees: a Chinese study based on the structure-process-outcome framework

This study proposes a unified framework for science and technology ethics review, integrating activities involving humans, animals, and other potential technological risks into a single evaluation system. The indicator system supports institutional self-assessment, promotes standardization, and guides continuous improvement. Preliminary findings indicate its feasibility and internal consistency, but these results should be interpreted cautiously due to the limited sample scope and reliance on self-reported data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Ethics
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-026-01392-9
Primary Topic
Animal testing and alternatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of an evaluation indicator system for the quality of science and technology ethics review committees: a Chinese study based on the structure-process-outcome framework

Ying Nian Wu, Lei Yang, Amily Wang Guénier, Xing Liu et al.
BMC Medical Ethics
Animal testing and alternatives
article

Development of an evaluation indicator system for the quality of science and technology ethics review committees: a Chinese study based on the structure-process-outcome framework

Ying Nian Wu, Lei Yang, Amily Wang Guénier, Xing Liu, Xin Zhang
article en

Abstract

This study proposes a unified framework for science and technology ethics review, integrating activities involving humans, animals, and other potential technological risks into a single evaluation system. The indicator system supports institutional self-assessment, promotes standardization, and guides continuous improvement. Preliminary findings indicate its feasibility and internal consistency, but these results should be interpreted cautiously due to the limited sample scope and reliance on self-reported data.

BMC Medical EthicsVol. 27(1)
Central South University (CN), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), University of Manchester (GB), Third Xiangya Hospital (CN), Xiangya Hospital Central South University (CN)
National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Animal testing and alternatives
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Development of an evaluation indicator system for the quality of science and technology ethics review committees: a Chinese study based on the structure-process-outcome framework — Ying Nian Wu, Lei Yang, et al. · BMC Medical Ethics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS