Phasefronts as surfaces of constant vertex time

In the geometric optics approximation typical of far fields (vanishing wavelength), wavefronts emerge as constant eikonal surfaces. The electric (E) and magnetic (H) field vectors are mutually perpendicular and tangent to the wavefront. They follow planar elliptical trajectories that reach their elliptical vertices simultaneously, “in phase”. Near a dipole, scatterer, or edge, however, the vanishing wavelength assumption fails. Here, E and H behave differently. They still follow planar elliptical trajectories, albeit with different phases, ec-centricities, and planes. We define (i) “vertex time” as the position dependent time when E or H reach their respective ellipse vertex, and (ii) “phasefronts” as surfaces of constant electric or magnetic vertex time. The spatial gradients of the vertex time are perpendicular to the E and H phasefronts, defining separate E and H phase velocity vector fields. As we move into the far field, the E and H phasefronts converge to each other and to the wavefront, providing a quantitative measure of how much the local disturbance deviates from “far field”. Applying this concept to the field of a monochromatic point dipole, we find that, contrary to common assumptions, the dipole has no far field near its axis, no matter how far away.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202533505010/pdf
Primary Topic
Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phasefronts as surfaces of constant vertex time

Julius Muschaweck, Willem L. Vos
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics
article

Phasefronts as surfaces of constant vertex time

Julius Muschaweck, Willem L. Vos
article en

Abstract

In the geometric optics approximation typical of far fields (vanishing wavelength), wavefronts emerge as constant eikonal surfaces. The electric (E) and magnetic (H) field vectors are mutually perpendicular and tangent to the wavefront. They follow planar elliptical trajectories that reach their elliptical vertices simultaneously, “in phase”. Near a dipole, scatterer, or edge, however, the vanishing wavelength assumption fails. Here, E and H behave differently. They still follow planar elliptical trajectories, albeit with different phases, ec-centricities, and planes. We define (i) “vertex time” as the position dependent time when E or H reach their respective ellipse vertex, and (ii) “phasefronts” as surfaces of constant electric or magnetic vertex time. The spatial gradients of the vertex time are perpendicular to the E and H phasefronts, defining separate E and H phase velocity vector fields. As we move into the far field, the E and H phasefronts converge to each other and to the wavefront, providing a quantitative measure of how much the local disturbance deviates from “far field”. Applying this concept to the field of a monochromatic point dipole, we find that, contrary to common assumptions, the dipole has no far field near its axis, no matter how far away.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Phasefronts as surfaces of constant vertex time — Julius Muschaweck, Willem L. Vos · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS