Comparative Analysis of Ground-Source and Air-Source Heat Pumps Under Demand Response Strategy

The electrification of space heating, combined with photovoltaic (PV) systems, plays a key role in decarbonizing the building sector but can lead to grid imbalances. Flexible technologies such as Demand Response (DR) can mitigate this. While several studies analyze DR strategies individually for Air Source Heat Pumps (ASHPs) or Ground Source Heat Pumps (GSHPs), direct comparisons remain limited. This study compares the flexibility of GSHP and ASHP systems in a residential building with PV under DR strategy. Results show that GSHP achieves higher efficiency (COP 6.26 vs. 3.52 for ASHP), better preheating (28.22% vs. 22.94% for ASHP), and greater self-sufficiency (40.23% vs. 33.84% for ASHP) with negligible impact on borehole temperature.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202565402006/pdf
Primary Topic
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Ground-Source and Air-Source Heat Pumps Under Demand Response Strategy

Patricia Ercoli, Giovanni Di Nicola, Alice Mugnini, Alessia Arteconi
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
article

Comparative Analysis of Ground-Source and Air-Source Heat Pumps Under Demand Response Strategy

Patricia Ercoli, Giovanni Di Nicola, Alice Mugnini, Alessia Arteconi
article en

Abstract

The electrification of space heating, combined with photovoltaic (PV) systems, plays a key role in decarbonizing the building sector but can lead to grid imbalances. Flexible technologies such as Demand Response (DR) can mitigate this. While several studies analyze DR strategies individually for Air Source Heat Pumps (ASHPs) or Ground Source Heat Pumps (GSHPs), direct comparisons remain limited. This study compares the flexibility of GSHP and ASHP systems in a residential building with PV under DR strategy. Results show that GSHP achieves higher efficiency (COP 6.26 vs. 3.52 for ASHP), better preheating (28.22% vs. 22.94% for ASHP), and greater self-sufficiency (40.23% vs. 33.84% for ASHP) with negligible impact on borehole temperature.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of Ground-Source and Air-Source Heat Pumps Under Demand Response Strategy — Patricia Ercoli, Giovanni Di Nicola, et al. · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS