Current Management of Craniosynostosis: A Nordic Pediatric Neurosurgery Network Study

Historically, management of craniosynostosis (CS) has been marked by substantial variation. Although recent advances in diagnostics, minimally invasive techniques, and computer-assisted planning might be expected to promote greater uniformity, significant differences persist, as shown in a large US survey of current practice patterns. To clarify the extent of heterogeneity in the Nordic countries (28 million inhabitants), the authors conducted a comprehensive survey of all centers treating CS in the region. All 11 centers responded (100%). Marked heterogeneity was evident across organizational structures, preferred surgical techniques, and follow-up routines. Although Norway has fully centralized treatment of CS, Denmark and Sweden divide management between 2 high-volume centers each, and Finland uses a mixed model combining major reference centers with smaller regional units. Surgical management of isolated sagittal synostosis also varies substantially, ranging from minimally invasive suturectomy with postoperative helmet therapy (9%) and spring-assisted cranioplasty (27%) to open suturectomy/strip craniectomy (9%) and more extensive cranial vault remodeling including H-craniectomy (55%). Syndromic and multi-suture cases are generally managed in multidisciplinary settings, although team composition differs between centers. Additional variation was seen in the use of computer-assisted planning, 3D models, intraoperative cutting guides, postoperative imaging, neurocognitive testing, craniometry, and patient-reported or parent-reported outcome measures. Despite advances in surgical techniques and technology, CS management across the Nordic region remains highly heterogeneous. Whether this variation affects neurocognitive, cosmetic, or functional outcomes is unknown. Future collaborative research will be essential to harmonize care and ensure optimal outcomes for children with craniosynostosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000012499
Primary Topic
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current Management of Craniosynostosis: A Nordic Pediatric Neurosurgery Network Study

Susanna Rantala, Daniel Nowinski, Lars J. Kolby, Niina Salokorpi et al.
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
article

Current Management of Craniosynostosis: A Nordic Pediatric Neurosurgery Network Study

Susanna Rantala, Daniel Nowinski, Lars J. Kolby, Niina Salokorpi, Ingvar Hákon Ólafsson, Ulrikke Straume Wiig, Liisi Ripatti, Kasper Amund Henriksen, Radek Fric, Lars Bøgeskov, Daniel Nilsson, Jon Foss-Skiftesvik, Bernt J. Due-Tønnessen, Atte Karppinen, Rauhala Minna Johanna
article en

Abstract

Historically, management of craniosynostosis (CS) has been marked by substantial variation. Although recent advances in diagnostics, minimally invasive techniques, and computer-assisted planning might be expected to promote greater uniformity, significant differences persist, as shown in a large US survey of current practice patterns. To clarify the extent of heterogeneity in the Nordic countries (28 million inhabitants), the authors conducted a comprehensive survey of all centers treating CS in the region. All 11 centers responded (100%). Marked heterogeneity was evident across organizational structures, preferred surgical techniques, and follow-up routines. Although Norway has fully centralized treatment of CS, Denmark and Sweden divide management between 2 high-volume centers each, and Finland uses a mixed model combining major reference centers with smaller regional units. Surgical management of isolated sagittal synostosis also varies substantially, ranging from minimally invasive suturectomy with postoperative helmet therapy (9%) and spring-assisted cranioplasty (27%) to open suturectomy/strip craniectomy (9%) and more extensive cranial vault remodeling including H-craniectomy (55%). Syndromic and multi-suture cases are generally managed in multidisciplinary settings, although team composition differs between centers. Additional variation was seen in the use of computer-assisted planning, 3D models, intraoperative cutting guides, postoperative imaging, neurocognitive testing, craniometry, and patient-reported or parent-reported outcome measures. Despite advances in surgical techniques and technology, CS management across the Nordic region remains highly heterogeneous. Whether this variation affects neurocognitive, cosmetic, or functional outcomes is unknown. Future collaborative research will be essential to harmonize care and ensure optimal outcomes for children with craniosynostosis.

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Reykjavík University (IS), University of Copenhagen (DK), Oslo University Hospital (NO), Uppsala University Hospital (SE), Oulu University Hospital (FI), Helsinki University Hospital (FI), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), Turku University Hospital (FI), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Kuopio University Hospital (FI), National University Hospital of Iceland (IS), Tampere University Hospital (FI), Tampere University (FI)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.