“If you agree with me, it must be true”: Social verification creates shared reality and consolidates impressions

A scarcely studied route to shared reality is the social verification of one's impressions, a process that should promote impression consolidation. We tested this prediction across four experiments ( N = 1342) using a hiring-decision paradigm. Participants evaluated pairs of similarly qualified applicants based on brief descriptions and portrait photos, made hiring decisions alongside a fictitious partner, and received either verification or no verification of their choices. Impression consolidation was assessed via subsequent speeded trait attributions. We expected stronger consolidation following verification, reflected in greater evaluative choice-consistency (i.e., attributing more positive traits to chosen than unchosen applicants), indexed by signal detection theory's discriminability, as well as increased accessibility (response latencies). Participants also reported experienced shared reality with the partner. Across studies, social verification reliably increased experienced shared reality and choice-consistent discriminability. Accessibility effects, in contrast, were inconsistent and context-dependent. Experiment 3 showed that verification enhanced choice-consistent discriminability only for recruitment-relevant traits. Experiment 4 showed no trait-specific consolidation for explicit, implied, or unrelated profile traits beyond evaluative choice-consistency. Moreover, across studies, experienced shared reality was positively associated with choice-consistent discriminability, but not with accessibility. Together, these findings indicate that social verification selectively consolidates impressions by stabilizing their evaluative structure—particularly on relevant domains—rather than by uniformly enhancing accessibility. Therefore, our results showed that even brief verification from an unfamiliar partner can strengthen shared reality and reinforce impressions primarily through increased evaluative consistency. Implications for impression formation and motivated cognition are discussed. • Shared reality (SR) reduces uncertainty about one's judgments and impressions. • We tested whether social verification boosts SR and strengthens impressions. • In a collaborative hiring task, SR increased when peers verified decisions. • Verification increased evaluative choice-consistency in trait attributions. • Social verification and SR can shape social cognition and judgments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104887
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“If you agree with me, it must be true”: Social verification creates shared reality and consolidates impressions

Gerrit Lamers, Matteo Masi, Gerald Echterhoff
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
article

“If you agree with me, it must be true”: Social verification creates shared reality and consolidates impressions

Gerrit Lamers, Matteo Masi, Gerald Echterhoff
article en

Abstract

A scarcely studied route to shared reality is the social verification of one's impressions, a process that should promote impression consolidation. We tested this prediction across four experiments ( N = 1342) using a hiring-decision paradigm. Participants evaluated pairs of similarly qualified applicants based on brief descriptions and portrait photos, made hiring decisions alongside a fictitious partner, and received either verification or no verification of their choices. Impression consolidation was assessed via subsequent speeded trait attributions. We expected stronger consolidation following verification, reflected in greater evaluative choice-consistency (i.e., attributing more positive traits to chosen than unchosen applicants), indexed by signal detection theory's discriminability, as well as increased accessibility (response latencies). Participants also reported experienced shared reality with the partner. Across studies, social verification reliably increased experienced shared reality and choice-consistent discriminability. Accessibility effects, in contrast, were inconsistent and context-dependent. Experiment 3 showed that verification enhanced choice-consistent discriminability only for recruitment-relevant traits. Experiment 4 showed no trait-specific consolidation for explicit, implied, or unrelated profile traits beyond evaluative choice-consistency. Moreover, across studies, experienced shared reality was positively associated with choice-consistent discriminability, but not with accessibility. Together, these findings indicate that social verification selectively consolidates impressions by stabilizing their evaluative structure—particularly on relevant domains—rather than by uniformly enhancing accessibility. Therefore, our results showed that even brief verification from an unfamiliar partner can strengthen shared reality and reinforce impressions primarily through increased evaluative consistency. Implications for impression formation and motivated cognition are discussed. • Shared reality (SR) reduces uncertainty about one's judgments and impressions. • We tested whether social verification boosts SR and strengthens impressions. • In a collaborative hiring task, SR increased when peers verified decisions. • Verification increased evaluative choice-consistency in trait attributions. • Social verification and SR can shape social cognition and judgments.

Journal of Experimental Social PsychologyVol. 124
University of Münster (DE), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.