Size-Sensitive Sequence of Tense in Hungarian

Abstract The English sentence John said that Mary was pregnant is ambiguous: Its simultaneous reading is John said: ‘Mary is pregnant’; its backshifted reading is John said: ‘Mary was pregnant’. Under Sequence of Tense Analyses of such past-under-past configurations (e.g. Ogihara 1995), the simultaneous reading arises if an embedded past head undergoes “deletion"-under-Agree with the matrix past head (the embedded past form is phonetically unaffected). Without deletion-under-Agree, the embedded past tense remains backshifted. The availability of deletion-under-Agree has been handled as a language-wide parameter, e.g. unlike English, Japanese lacks deletion-under-Agree (e.g. Ogihara and Sharvit 2012). In Hungarian, speech-reporting clauses are Japanese-like and obligatorily backshifted, whereas non-speech-reporting clauses are English-like and have a simultaneous reading. I propose that that speech-reporting clauses are internally larger and hence the impossibility of deletion-under-Agree in these clauses can be analyzed with a Williams Cycle effect (e.g. Williams 2003).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Linguistic Inquiry
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.a.557
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Size-Sensitive Sequence of Tense in Hungarian

János Egressy
Linguistic Inquiry
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

Size-Sensitive Sequence of Tense in Hungarian

János Egressy
article en

Abstract

Abstract The English sentence John said that Mary was pregnant is ambiguous: Its simultaneous reading is John said: ‘Mary is pregnant’; its backshifted reading is John said: ‘Mary was pregnant’. Under Sequence of Tense Analyses of such past-under-past configurations (e.g. Ogihara 1995), the simultaneous reading arises if an embedded past head undergoes “deletion"-under-Agree with the matrix past head (the embedded past form is phonetically unaffected). Without deletion-under-Agree, the embedded past tense remains backshifted. The availability of deletion-under-Agree has been handled as a language-wide parameter, e.g. unlike English, Japanese lacks deletion-under-Agree (e.g. Ogihara and Sharvit 2012). In Hungarian, speech-reporting clauses are Japanese-like and obligatorily backshifted, whereas non-speech-reporting clauses are English-like and have a simultaneous reading. I propose that that speech-reporting clauses are internally larger and hence the impossibility of deletion-under-Agree in these clauses can be analyzed with a Williams Cycle effect (e.g. Williams 2003).

Linguistic Inquiry
Campbell Collaboration (NO)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.