Online Public Shaming, the Duties of Social Media Platforms, and the Case for Regulation

Abstract What should we do in response to the prevalence of wrongful public shaming that occurs online? In this paper, we offer one part of the answer to this question. We argue that there is a compelling case for social media platforms themselves to be active in tackling wrongful online public shaming, as well as for government regulation of these platforms to stimulate such activity. We recognize that we are far from the first authors to call for the regulation of social media platforms. None the less, our arguments and conclusions have two distinguishing features that warrant emphasis. First, whereas others invoke the familiar risks associated with fake news and with hate speech, we focus exclusively on the need for regulation to address wrongful online public shaming. Second, as will become apparent, our analysis assigns special relevance to the social norms that emerge on the Internet, and it highlights the important role that these norms must play in resolving the issues with which we are concerned.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy & Technology
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-01031-y
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Online Public Shaming, the Duties of Social Media Platforms, and the Case for Regulation

Tom Parr, Paul Billingham
Philosophy & Technology
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
article

Online Public Shaming, the Duties of Social Media Platforms, and the Case for Regulation

Tom Parr, Paul Billingham
article en

Abstract

Abstract What should we do in response to the prevalence of wrongful public shaming that occurs online? In this paper, we offer one part of the answer to this question. We argue that there is a compelling case for social media platforms themselves to be active in tackling wrongful online public shaming, as well as for government regulation of these platforms to stimulate such activity. We recognize that we are far from the first authors to call for the regulation of social media platforms. None the less, our arguments and conclusions have two distinguishing features that warrant emphasis. First, whereas others invoke the familiar risks associated with fake news and with hate speech, we focus exclusively on the need for regulation to address wrongful online public shaming. Second, as will become apparent, our analysis assigns special relevance to the social norms that emerge on the Internet, and it highlights the important role that these norms must play in resolving the issues with which we are concerned.

Philosophy & TechnologyVol. 39(1)
University of Warwick (GB), University of Oxford (GB)
Magdalen College, University of Oxford, University of Warwick, University of Oxford, Akademie Věd České Republiky, Nuffield College, University of Oxford
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.