Labor-power and precolonial Africa: Nyerere, Meillassoux, Marx

Abstract That people are wealth is a core concept in the history and anthropology of Africa. A claim about value in precolonial social orders, it has also been mobilised to explain economic development in colonial and postcolonial settings. Here I revisit two twentieth-century efforts to link wealth-in-people to economic modernisation. One was made by Nyerere, who argued that precolonial kin-based commitments to work cooperatively were a developmental resource that could substitute for capitalist investment. The second is from Meillassoux, who argued that the persistence of precolonial kin-based production facilitated capitalist development by affording a double-exploitation of labor. The arguments reached different conclusions but relied on a common premise: precolonial wealth-in people was premised on the capacity to labor, and that was its actual or possible contribution to modern development. This premise is anachronistic. The valuation of people as vessels of labor-power is particular to the capitalist social order. It is unlike the valuation of people as persons-in-relationship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialectical Anthropology
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-026-09813-2
Primary Topic
Colonialism, slavery, and trade
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Labor-power and precolonial Africa: Nyerere, Meillassoux, Marx

Hylton White
Dialectical Anthropology
Colonialism, slavery, and trade
article

Labor-power and precolonial Africa: Nyerere, Meillassoux, Marx

Hylton White
article en

Abstract

Abstract That people are wealth is a core concept in the history and anthropology of Africa. A claim about value in precolonial social orders, it has also been mobilised to explain economic development in colonial and postcolonial settings. Here I revisit two twentieth-century efforts to link wealth-in-people to economic modernisation. One was made by Nyerere, who argued that precolonial kin-based commitments to work cooperatively were a developmental resource that could substitute for capitalist investment. The second is from Meillassoux, who argued that the persistence of precolonial kin-based production facilitated capitalist development by affording a double-exploitation of labor. The arguments reached different conclusions but relied on a common premise: precolonial wealth-in people was premised on the capacity to labor, and that was its actual or possible contribution to modern development. This premise is anachronistic. The valuation of people as vessels of labor-power is particular to the capitalist social order. It is unlike the valuation of people as persons-in-relationship.

Dialectical Anthropology
University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Zhejiang University
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Colonialism, slavery, and trade
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.