Deviations from pre-pandemic lung cancer mortality trends in the United States: a 25-year counterfactual analysis (1999–2023)

The COVID-19 pandemic coincided with substantial disruptions to cancer care services worldwide. However, comprehensive population-level assessments of deviations from expected lung cancer mortality trends during the pandemic period using rigorous counterfactual methods remain limited, particularly regarding heterogeneity across demographic and geographic subgroups. We performed a counterfactual analysis examining lung cancer mortality trends among United States adults aged 45 years and older (1999–2023) using CDC WONDER mortality data. Joinpoint regression characterized pre-pandemic trends (1999–2019) to project expected mortality rates for 2020–2023. Mortality gaps were calculated as differences between observed and expected age-adjusted rates across 66 demographic and geographic strata. Interrupted time series analysis evaluated pandemic-associated trend modifications. Population-weighted linear regression assessed dose-response relationships between state-level COVID-19 burden and lung cancer excess mortality. National age-adjusted lung cancer mortality rates declined from 156.03 per 100,000 in 1999 to 94.90 in 2019 (annual percent change: -4.56, 95% CI: -4.92 to -4.20). During the pandemic period, cumulative excess lung cancer mortality totaled 11.26 per 100,000, with statistically significant positive gaps emerging in 2021 (+ 3.67), 2022 (+ 2.77), and 2023 (+ 4.99). Non-Hispanic White populations exhibited three-fold greater 2023 lung cancer excess (+ 6.21) compared to Hispanic populations (+ 1.81). Age-stratified analysis revealed sixteen-fold gradients in lung cancer mortality gaps, from + 1.53 per 100,000 in the 45–54 years cohort to + 24.75 in those aged 85 years and older. State-level cumulative lung cancer mortality gaps ranged from − 40.72 to + 63.16 per 100,000. A significant positive ecological association was observed between state-level cumulative COVID-19 mortality and cumulative lung cancer mortality gaps (β = 0.056, 95% CI: 0.010–0.103, P = 0.022). The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with deviations from expected lung cancer mortality trends, exhibiting substantial demographic and geographic heterogeneity. These patterns may reflect differences in healthcare system capacity across populations. Population-specific surveillance systems and infrastructure investments warrant consideration to maintain cancer care continuity during future public health emergencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-26429-x
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deviations from pre-pandemic lung cancer mortality trends in the United States: a 25-year counterfactual analysis (1999–2023)

Sichang Wang
BMC Public Health
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
article

Deviations from pre-pandemic lung cancer mortality trends in the United States: a 25-year counterfactual analysis (1999–2023)

Sichang Wang
article en

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic coincided with substantial disruptions to cancer care services worldwide. However, comprehensive population-level assessments of deviations from expected lung cancer mortality trends during the pandemic period using rigorous counterfactual methods remain limited, particularly regarding heterogeneity across demographic and geographic subgroups. We performed a counterfactual analysis examining lung cancer mortality trends among United States adults aged 45 years and older (1999–2023) using CDC WONDER mortality data. Joinpoint regression characterized pre-pandemic trends (1999–2019) to project expected mortality rates for 2020–2023. Mortality gaps were calculated as differences between observed and expected age-adjusted rates across 66 demographic and geographic strata. Interrupted time series analysis evaluated pandemic-associated trend modifications. Population-weighted linear regression assessed dose-response relationships between state-level COVID-19 burden and lung cancer excess mortality. National age-adjusted lung cancer mortality rates declined from 156.03 per 100,000 in 1999 to 94.90 in 2019 (annual percent change: -4.56, 95% CI: -4.92 to -4.20). During the pandemic period, cumulative excess lung cancer mortality totaled 11.26 per 100,000, with statistically significant positive gaps emerging in 2021 (+ 3.67), 2022 (+ 2.77), and 2023 (+ 4.99). Non-Hispanic White populations exhibited three-fold greater 2023 lung cancer excess (+ 6.21) compared to Hispanic populations (+ 1.81). Age-stratified analysis revealed sixteen-fold gradients in lung cancer mortality gaps, from + 1.53 per 100,000 in the 45–54 years cohort to + 24.75 in those aged 85 years and older. State-level cumulative lung cancer mortality gaps ranged from − 40.72 to + 63.16 per 100,000. A significant positive ecological association was observed between state-level cumulative COVID-19 mortality and cumulative lung cancer mortality gaps (β = 0.056, 95% CI: 0.010–0.103, P = 0.022). The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with deviations from expected lung cancer mortality trends, exhibiting substantial demographic and geographic heterogeneity. These patterns may reflect differences in healthcare system capacity across populations. Population-specific surveillance systems and infrastructure investments warrant consideration to maintain cancer care continuity during future public health emergencies.

BMC Public HealthVol. 26(1)
First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.