Limitations and opportunities in multi-omics integration for neurodevelopmental, neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders: A systematic review

Recent advances in high-throughput technologies have led to an increased generation of biological data across genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenomics, and metabolomics. However, a major challenge remains: effectively integrating these multi-omics datasets to allow a more holistic understanding of the complex, interconnected mechanisms underlying human diseases. Neurodevelopmental, neurodegenerative, and psychiatric disorders are particularly multifactorial and heterogeneous, making them candidates for multi-omics approaches. In this context, this systematic review assesses the current state of multi-omics integration in neurological research. Records retrieved from five major databases were processed, and 156 studies were included for further analysis. The most frequently studied conditions were Alzheimer's Disease, Depressive Disorder and Parkinson's Disease, with epigenomics-transcriptomics and metagenomics-metabolomics emerging as the most common omics pairings. The field remains dominated by studies integrating pairs of omics layers. Only a limited number of computational tools are currently being applied to the integration of more than two omics layers, highlighting a gap in comprehensive multi-omics modeling. Despite progress, key challenges persist, including data accessibility and the need for standardized frameworks to allow cross-study comparisons. Moreover, most computational findings lack experimental validation in wet-laboratory settings. Future research should address these challenges, develop scalable algorithms for integrating multi-omics data, and leverage large, open-access datasets. Integrating computational predictions with experimental validation could help researchers prioritize high-confidence biomarkers relevant to clinical applications. Collaborative efforts among bioinformaticians, clinicians, and experimentalists will be essential to translating these advances into clinically actionable solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuroscience
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2026.01.019
Primary Topic
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Limitations and opportunities in multi-omics integration for neurodevelopmental, neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders: A systematic review

Marcos Vinícius Esteca, Gabriela Flores Gonçalves, Márcio Dorn, Guilherme da Silva Fernandes et al.
Neuroscience
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
article

Limitations and opportunities in multi-omics integration for neurodevelopmental, neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders: A systematic review

Marcos Vinícius Esteca, Gabriela Flores Gonçalves, Márcio Dorn, Guilherme da Silva Fernandes, José Cláudio Fonseca Moreira, Franklin Vinny Medina Nunes, Rafael Diogo Weimer
article en

Abstract

Recent advances in high-throughput technologies have led to an increased generation of biological data across genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenomics, and metabolomics. However, a major challenge remains: effectively integrating these multi-omics datasets to allow a more holistic understanding of the complex, interconnected mechanisms underlying human diseases. Neurodevelopmental, neurodegenerative, and psychiatric disorders are particularly multifactorial and heterogeneous, making them candidates for multi-omics approaches. In this context, this systematic review assesses the current state of multi-omics integration in neurological research. Records retrieved from five major databases were processed, and 156 studies were included for further analysis. The most frequently studied conditions were Alzheimer's Disease, Depressive Disorder and Parkinson's Disease, with epigenomics-transcriptomics and metagenomics-metabolomics emerging as the most common omics pairings. The field remains dominated by studies integrating pairs of omics layers. Only a limited number of computational tools are currently being applied to the integration of more than two omics layers, highlighting a gap in comprehensive multi-omics modeling. Despite progress, key challenges persist, including data accessibility and the need for standardized frameworks to allow cross-study comparisons. Moreover, most computational findings lack experimental validation in wet-laboratory settings. Future research should address these challenges, develop scalable algorithms for integrating multi-omics data, and leverage large, open-access datasets. Integrating computational predictions with experimental validation could help researchers prioritize high-confidence biomarkers relevant to clinical applications. Collaborative efforts among bioinformaticians, clinicians, and experimentalists will be essential to translating these advances into clinically actionable solutions.

NeuroscienceVol. 599
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.