Strategic Orientations and Organizational Resilience: The Moderating Role of Digital Technology

Firms pursuing organizational resilience face competing demands: sustaining growth while reducing performance volatility. This study examines how strategic orientations shape trade-offs between these resilience dimensions and how digital technology breadth and depth moderate these strategy–resilience relationships. Drawing on dynamic capability theory, this study analyzes panel data from Chinese high-tech manufacturing firms to investigate how profit-oriented and growth-oriented strategies affect two dimensions of organizational resilience—growth resilience (continuous growth) and volatility resilience (performance stability). Results reveal two distinct mechanisms: a consolidating mechanism whereby profit-oriented strategy reduces performance volatility while constraining growth resilience, and a capitalizing mechanism whereby growth-oriented strategy strengthens growth resilience while increasing performance volatility. Digital technology breadth moderates both strategies but introduces complexity costs that weaken anticipated volatility reduction benefits. Digital technology depth shows limited moderating capacity, amplifying profit-oriented strategy’s growth constraints without significantly reducing performance volatility. This study contributes to organizational resilience literature by demonstrating that organizational resilience dimensions involve systematic trade-offs rather than complementary gains, and extends dynamic capability theory by identifying strategic orientation as a driver that shapes how firms configure and deploy dynamic capabilities toward different organizational resilience outcomes. For managers, these findings suggest aligning strategic orientation with organizational priorities for stability versus growth, recognizing that enhancing one resilience dimension may constrain another, and ensuring digital technology investments match strategic priorities, as broad adoption introduces complexity costs that may offset anticipated benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14020159
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategic Orientations and Organizational Resilience: The Moderating Role of Digital Technology

Xia Feng, Xiaobo Wu
Systems
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
article

Strategic Orientations and Organizational Resilience: The Moderating Role of Digital Technology

Xia Feng, Xiaobo Wu
article en

Abstract

Firms pursuing organizational resilience face competing demands: sustaining growth while reducing performance volatility. This study examines how strategic orientations shape trade-offs between these resilience dimensions and how digital technology breadth and depth moderate these strategy–resilience relationships. Drawing on dynamic capability theory, this study analyzes panel data from Chinese high-tech manufacturing firms to investigate how profit-oriented and growth-oriented strategies affect two dimensions of organizational resilience—growth resilience (continuous growth) and volatility resilience (performance stability). Results reveal two distinct mechanisms: a consolidating mechanism whereby profit-oriented strategy reduces performance volatility while constraining growth resilience, and a capitalizing mechanism whereby growth-oriented strategy strengthens growth resilience while increasing performance volatility. Digital technology breadth moderates both strategies but introduces complexity costs that weaken anticipated volatility reduction benefits. Digital technology depth shows limited moderating capacity, amplifying profit-oriented strategy’s growth constraints without significantly reducing performance volatility. This study contributes to organizational resilience literature by demonstrating that organizational resilience dimensions involve systematic trade-offs rather than complementary gains, and extends dynamic capability theory by identifying strategic orientation as a driver that shapes how firms configure and deploy dynamic capabilities toward different organizational resilience outcomes. For managers, these findings suggest aligning strategic orientation with organizational priorities for stability versus growth, recognizing that enhancing one resilience dimension may constrain another, and ensuring digital technology investments match strategic priorities, as broad adoption introduces complexity costs that may offset anticipated benefits.

SystemsVol. 14(2)
Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.