Sowing the seeds of change: unveiling farmer types to promote climate-smart agriculture adoption in Europe

Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) promises to provide a triple win in economic viability, food security and climate change mitigation. This study develops a European farmer typology to enhance the adoption of CSA by combining two research streams, the COM-B behavioural-change theory and segmentation research. Using a survey of 603 farmers from five European countries (Denmark, Lithuania, Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain), the study applies a systematic approach, examining capability, opportunity and motivation factors of the COM-B model. Data analysis resulted into classifying farmers into four types: environmentalists, constrained, indifferents, and traditionalists . The farmer typology reveals that all components of the COM-B model were useful to differentiate the four farmer groups. Environmentalists express high intention to adopt CSA, motivated both internally, by capabilities and motivation, and externally by the opportunities in the social and food systems environments. Constrained farmers share similar intentions but face significant barriers in physical opportunities, such as limited access to markets and credit, policy framework and market willingness to pay. Indifferents, despite sharing some commonalities with constrained farmers, they demonstrate low interest in CSA mainly due to lower levels of psychological capabilities and motivation. Finally, the traditionalists face the strongest barriers in capability, opportunity and motivation in the transition to CSA. This research contributes to the literature by providing a holistic and systematic approach to segment farmers based on key barriers and drivers in adopting CSA and linking these with four categories of tailored strategy and policy interventions aiming to enhance CSA adoption across diverse farming contexts in Europe. • Farmers are classified into four types with respect to adoption of CSA using the COM-B model: environmentalists, constrained, indifferents, and traditionalists. • Environmentalists express high intention to adopt CSA, motivated both internally, by capabilities and motivation, and externally by the opportunities in the social and food systems environments. • Constrained farmers share similar intentions but face significant barriers in physical opportunities, such as limited access to markets and credit, policy framework and market willingness to pay. • Indifferents, despite sharing some commonalities with constrained farmers, they demonstrate low interest in CSA mainly due to deficits in their psychological capabilities and motivation. • Traditionalists face the strongest barriers in capability, opportunity and motivation in the transition to CSA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104043
Primary Topic
Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sowing the seeds of change: unveiling farmer types to promote climate-smart agriculture adoption in Europe

Marilena Gemtou, Søren Marcus Pedersen, Alexia Izco Zabalza, Gohar Isakhanyan et al.
Journal of Rural Studies
Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
article

Sowing the seeds of change: unveiling farmer types to promote climate-smart agriculture adoption in Europe

Marilena Gemtou, Søren Marcus Pedersen, Alexia Izco Zabalza, Gohar Isakhanyan, Marcel Kornelis, Spyros Fountas, Liselotte Puggaard, Jon Bienzobas Adrian
article en

Abstract

Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) promises to provide a triple win in economic viability, food security and climate change mitigation. This study develops a European farmer typology to enhance the adoption of CSA by combining two research streams, the COM-B behavioural-change theory and segmentation research. Using a survey of 603 farmers from five European countries (Denmark, Lithuania, Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain), the study applies a systematic approach, examining capability, opportunity and motivation factors of the COM-B model. Data analysis resulted into classifying farmers into four types: environmentalists, constrained, indifferents, and traditionalists . The farmer typology reveals that all components of the COM-B model were useful to differentiate the four farmer groups. Environmentalists express high intention to adopt CSA, motivated both internally, by capabilities and motivation, and externally by the opportunities in the social and food systems environments. Constrained farmers share similar intentions but face significant barriers in physical opportunities, such as limited access to markets and credit, policy framework and market willingness to pay. Indifferents, despite sharing some commonalities with constrained farmers, they demonstrate low interest in CSA mainly due to lower levels of psychological capabilities and motivation. Finally, the traditionalists face the strongest barriers in capability, opportunity and motivation in the transition to CSA. This research contributes to the literature by providing a holistic and systematic approach to segment farmers based on key barriers and drivers in adopting CSA and linking these with four categories of tailored strategy and policy interventions aiming to enhance CSA adoption across diverse farming contexts in Europe. • Farmers are classified into four types with respect to adoption of CSA using the COM-B model: environmentalists, constrained, indifferents, and traditionalists. • Environmentalists express high intention to adopt CSA, motivated both internally, by capabilities and motivation, and externally by the opportunities in the social and food systems environments. • Constrained farmers share similar intentions but face significant barriers in physical opportunities, such as limited access to markets and credit, policy framework and market willingness to pay. • Indifferents, despite sharing some commonalities with constrained farmers, they demonstrate low interest in CSA mainly due to deficits in their psychological capabilities and motivation. • Traditionalists face the strongest barriers in capability, opportunity and motivation in the transition to CSA.

Journal of Rural StudiesVol. 123
Agricultural University of Athens (GR), University of Copenhagen (DK), Danish Cattle Research Centre (DK), Instituto Navarro de Tecnología e Infraestructuras Agroalimentarias (ES), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
European Commission
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.