Safety, performance, and remote programming utilization of an insertable cardiac monitor: The LUX-Dx PERFORM study

<h3>Study Identifier</h3> NCT04732728 <h3>Background</h3> Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are designed to record subcutaneous electrocardiographic data for the diagnosis and management of arrhythmias. <h3>Objective</h3> The LUX-Dx PERFORM study evaluated the safety of the LUX-Dx ICM, the utilization of remote reprogramming, and the performance of the LUX-Dx arrhythmia detection algorithms. <h3>Methods</h3> The study included 727 patients with multiple indications for an ICM including atrial fibrillation management, syncope, and cryptogenic stroke. The primary safety endpoint was evaluated via 30-day and 12-month ICM system-related complication-free rates. Device programming changes were quantified by type and impact on episode detections. A subset of 601 patients was enrolled in a 14-day Holter study to evaluate the performance of the ICM against a third-party extended Holter monitor patch. <h3>Results</h3> ICM implants occurred in hospital (n = 547; 76%) and clinic settings (n = 170; 24%) with an extremely low 12-month complication rate (n = 3; 0.4%). Device reprogramming was performed on 184 patients (26%), with 82% of programming changes occurring remotely. Programming adjustments to reduce or enhance device detections led to an approximately 2-fold decrease or increase in monthly episodes, respectively. In the Holter substudy, the LUX-Dx identified 23 patients with atrial fibrillation episodes that were not detected by the extended Holter monitor and demonstrated 100% sensitivity for detecting pause episodes. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Fewer than 1 in 200 patients had a complication within 1 year of ICM implant, and the LUX-Dx ICM demonstrated strong arrhythmia detection performance relative to an industry-standard patch monitor. Remote programming was frequently used, which may enhance detection and streamline data processing and care in the device clinic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heart Rhythm O2
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2026.01.026
Primary Topic
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety, performance, and remote programming utilization of an insertable cardiac monitor: The LUX-Dx PERFORM study

John Garner, Vasanth Ravikumar, Keith Herrmann, Craig Stolen et al.
Heart Rhythm O2
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
article

Safety, performance, and remote programming utilization of an insertable cardiac monitor: The LUX-Dx PERFORM study

John Garner, Vasanth Ravikumar, Keith Herrmann, Craig Stolen, Venkata V. Bavikati, Mark Richards, Torri Schwartz, Jonathan W. Dukes, Molly E. Kupfer, Brynn Okeson, Harish Manyam, Sean D. Pokorney, John D. Rogers, Deepa Mahajan
article en

Abstract

<h3>Study Identifier</h3> NCT04732728 <h3>Background</h3> Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are designed to record subcutaneous electrocardiographic data for the diagnosis and management of arrhythmias. <h3>Objective</h3> The LUX-Dx PERFORM study evaluated the safety of the LUX-Dx ICM, the utilization of remote reprogramming, and the performance of the LUX-Dx arrhythmia detection algorithms. <h3>Methods</h3> The study included 727 patients with multiple indications for an ICM including atrial fibrillation management, syncope, and cryptogenic stroke. The primary safety endpoint was evaluated via 30-day and 12-month ICM system-related complication-free rates. Device programming changes were quantified by type and impact on episode detections. A subset of 601 patients was enrolled in a 14-day Holter study to evaluate the performance of the ICM against a third-party extended Holter monitor patch. <h3>Results</h3> ICM implants occurred in hospital (n = 547; 76%) and clinic settings (n = 170; 24%) with an extremely low 12-month complication rate (n = 3; 0.4%). Device reprogramming was performed on 184 patients (26%), with 82% of programming changes occurring remotely. Programming adjustments to reduce or enhance device detections led to an approximately 2-fold decrease or increase in monthly episodes, respectively. In the Holter substudy, the LUX-Dx identified 23 patients with atrial fibrillation episodes that were not detected by the extended Holter monitor and demonstrated 100% sensitivity for detecting pause episodes. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Fewer than 1 in 200 patients had a complication within 1 year of ICM implant, and the LUX-Dx ICM demonstrated strong arrhythmia detection performance relative to an industry-standard patch monitor. Remote programming was frequently used, which may enhance detection and streamline data processing and care in the device clinic.

Heart Rhythm O2
Idaho State University (US), Erlanger Health System (US), Boston Scientific (United States) (US), Clinical Research Institute (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Ventura County Medical Center (US), Medical Research Associates (US), Tallahassee Memorial HealthCare (US), Scripps Clinic (US), CoxHealth (US)
Boston Scientific Corporation
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.