Target lipid model update and proposed refinement of HC5 calculation procedure

For over two decades, the Target Lipid Model (TLM) has been used to characterize the aquatic toxicity of hydrocarbons, petroleum products, ionic and other non-ionic organic chemicals across a wide range of organisms. The TLM has also been applied to derive hazard concentrations intended to protect 95% of aquatic species (i.e., HC5). The TLM database has expanded to include multiple acute and chronic data (over 100 species from 8 major taxonomic groups) across over 400 individual chemicals for both standard apical (e.g., mortality, reproduction, growth) and relevant non-apical endpoints (e.g., cardiotoxicity). Given these improvements, there is an opportunity to re-evaluate the lipid-water partitioning models so they are common across the TLM and PETROTOX models. The ability of each partitioning model to predict acute and chronic effects was evaluated using statistical goodness-of-fit descriptors in addition to considerations for model accessibility and ease of application. While all lipid-water partitioning models performed similarly, the Abraham-type formulation of the Polyparameter Target Site Model (pp-TSM) has been selected as the preferred lipid-water partitioning model. Previous estimations of chronic effects HC5s used a statistical extrapolation procedure with distributional constraints or applied boot-strapped error estimation to species sensitivity only. To eliminate distributional constraints and account for additional model prediction errors, an alternative approach is proposed to calculate HC5s using boot-strapped error estimation of the TLM calibration to derive prediction errors which include the uncertainty in model parameters and the empirical toxicity distribution. Predicted HC5s using this method are protective of 95% of species based on comparison to measured acute, chronic, and sublethal data. Advantages of this calculation method are discussed along with implications for future TLM applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgag029
Primary Topic
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Target lipid model update and proposed refinement of HC5 calculation procedure

Aaron D. Redman, Richard F. Carbonaro, Tifany L. Torralba–Sanchez, Thomas F. Parkerton et al.
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
article

Target lipid model update and proposed refinement of HC5 calculation procedure

Aaron D. Redman, Richard F. Carbonaro, Tifany L. Torralba–Sanchez, Thomas F. Parkerton, Joy A. McGrath, Louise Camenzuli, Katherine A. Colvin, Yves Verhaegen, Christopher J. Fanelli
article en

Abstract

For over two decades, the Target Lipid Model (TLM) has been used to characterize the aquatic toxicity of hydrocarbons, petroleum products, ionic and other non-ionic organic chemicals across a wide range of organisms. The TLM has also been applied to derive hazard concentrations intended to protect 95% of aquatic species (i.e., HC5). The TLM database has expanded to include multiple acute and chronic data (over 100 species from 8 major taxonomic groups) across over 400 individual chemicals for both standard apical (e.g., mortality, reproduction, growth) and relevant non-apical endpoints (e.g., cardiotoxicity). Given these improvements, there is an opportunity to re-evaluate the lipid-water partitioning models so they are common across the TLM and PETROTOX models. The ability of each partitioning model to predict acute and chronic effects was evaluated using statistical goodness-of-fit descriptors in addition to considerations for model accessibility and ease of application. While all lipid-water partitioning models performed similarly, the Abraham-type formulation of the Polyparameter Target Site Model (pp-TSM) has been selected as the preferred lipid-water partitioning model. Previous estimations of chronic effects HC5s used a statistical extrapolation procedure with distributional constraints or applied boot-strapped error estimation to species sensitivity only. To eliminate distributional constraints and account for additional model prediction errors, an alternative approach is proposed to calculate HC5s using boot-strapped error estimation of the TLM calibration to derive prediction errors which include the uncertainty in model parameters and the empirical toxicity distribution. Predicted HC5s using this method are protective of 95% of species based on comparison to measured acute, chronic, and sublethal data. Advantages of this calculation method are discussed along with implications for future TLM applications.

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Enviscope (Germany) (DE), Concawe (BE), ExxonMobil (Germany) (DE), White Plains Hospital (US), The Institute of the Polish Language of the Polish Academy of Sciences (PL), Arcadis (United States) (US), Clinical Research Associates (US), Manhattan University (US), ExxonMobil (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.